Date: Sat, 20 May 2000 23:37:34 +0100 From: Ben Smithurst <ben@scientia.demon.co.uk> To: Doug Barton <DougB@gorean.org> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: better than pine? Message-ID: <20000520233734.B15686@strontium.scientia.demon.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <3926EBB6.E0C1CDD7@gorean.org> References: <Pine.BSF.4.10.10005162201530.75114-100000@home.offwhite.net> <200005171727.KAA09714@cortex.NSMA.Arizona.EDU> <20000517202936.H21557@strontium.scientia.demon.co.uk> <3926EBB6.E0C1CDD7@gorean.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Doug Barton wrote: > Ben Smithurst wrote: > >> Pine is over four times bigger than my mail client and news client put >> together. Why?? From what I've seen, Pine is a featureless pile of >> junk. > > So you obviously haven't seen much. True. I used it for a few months when I first started with FreeBSD but never liked it enough to find out more about it. Within a few minutes of finding Mutt, I was hooked and I've never moved to anything else. But does Pine really compare to Mutt in terms of features? (Perhaps I should have put "compared to Mutt" on the end of my last sentence above.) I can't see anything in Pine's setup menu which correspond to Mutt's send-hook or save-hook features for example (unless you want to correct me). -- Ben Smithurst / ben@scientia.demon.co.uk / PGP: 0x99392F7D To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000520233734.B15686>