From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 10 23:53:28 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BCDD91F; Wed, 10 Oct 2012 23:53:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gjb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from onyx.glenbarber.us (onyx.glenbarber.us [IPv6:2607:fc50:1000:c200::face]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FB4E8FC16; Wed, 10 Oct 2012 23:53:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from glenbarber.us (kaos.glenbarber.us [76.124.49.145]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: gjb) by onyx.glenbarber.us (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1C59D23F645; Wed, 10 Oct 2012 19:53:26 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 19:53:25 -0400 From: Glen Barber To: Bruce Cran Subject: Re: FreeBSD 10-CURRENT and 9-STABLE snapshots Message-ID: <20121010235325.GJ10429@glenbarber.us> References: <50717D35.7040106@affle.com> <1349727367645-5750424.post@n5.nabble.com> <50754E24.4040903@orange.fr> <1349873186577-5750838.post@n5.nabble.com> <5075AA96.6050101@orange.fr> <20121010234056.GI10429@glenbarber.us> <50760914.5080608@cran.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="QxN5xOWGsmh5a4wb" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <50760914.5080608@cran.org.uk> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT amd64 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: Claude Buisson , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 23:53:28 -0000 --QxN5xOWGsmh5a4wb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 12:47:32AM +0100, Bruce Cran wrote: > On 11/10/2012 00:40, Glen Barber wrote: > > This is a problem, and for what it is worth (and as Mark mentioned in a > > previous reply), the end goal is "official" snapshots. >=20 > I think a lot of people will be wondering what's special about _your_=20 > snapshots that they'll become official=20 The answer is simple. "Nothing." We're all on the same team here. > why not just make pub.allbsd.org the official source? >=20 Because offloading official snapshots to third-party sites (any third-party site) rather than doing the work ourselves is the wrong solution. Glen --QxN5xOWGsmh5a4wb Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJQdgp1AAoJEFJPDDeguUaj9y0IAJDxb52yCo9UL81KObi0DpNZ vnIE8OuLpEaHv1WYrD2kRdgVwg14rccEuhZ5si3tzIPquGy7ySQFR3E4YyrYOchj xiitpT9r6pOpwAb21Mi5CHqAwul9ZZAH8qwh9rJt8bCQLD8aIQ4hMp+w7B6SFrYs fvfEvGYF20Q2/9dcpTrXlC9WqLPC5KBNQGxf22NOND3XvNQYgGdbYi+g2MZnBXbb bvBnQKSrOusxXVF6iWMz842aOHP3ugpDEhywYJFtvfPVOd/OHlsLlD+5NIPGTj5h GpEQxh9rZOFL9IiL5IFGUJtlegnthQr1HGGC/LpY0w0u81kBZoyma/RLh7fcDMo= =KgEw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --QxN5xOWGsmh5a4wb--