From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 21 15:39:00 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AE9E16A4CF for ; Fri, 21 Nov 2003 15:39:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from lakemtao05.cox.net (lakemtao05.cox.net [68.1.17.116]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2519D43FE3 for ; Fri, 21 Nov 2003 15:38:59 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from micheal@tsgincorporated.com) Received: from dredster ([68.12.79.37]) by lakemtao05.cox.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.05 201-253-122-130-105-20030824) with SMTP id <20031121233858.YMTG29834.lakemtao05.cox.net@dredster> for ; Fri, 21 Nov 2003 18:38:58 -0500 Message-ID: <039601c3b088$b94c6be0$0201a8c0@dredster> From: "Micheal Patterson" To: References: <00cb01c3b06d$9266a470$4df24243@tsgincorporated.com> Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 17:39:32 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Subject: Re: MailScanner and sendmail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 23:39:00 -0000 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Micheal Patterson" To: Sent: Friday, November 21, 2003 2:25 PM Subject: MailScanner and sendmail > Has anyone successfully gotten MailScanner working with a version of > sendmail from version 8.12.9 onward? I tried to add this last night and ran > into an evil circle of permissions issues. Set normally, mail would go into > the clientqueue after scanned, but owned by root with 600 permissions and > the smmsp account couldn't read these files, then with sendmail and > MailScanner set to use smmsp user / groups, it could send form clientqueue > but the sendamil daemon couldn't store mail in mqueue. I would like to use > this as it's got advantages over using Amavis however, with this much hassle > on a stock sendmail installation, I'm beginning to think it would just be > best to stick with Amavis and forget about the hassle. > > -- I'll add to this that both sendmail and MailScanner have both been installed on Fbsd 4.9 from ports. -- Micheal Patterson Network Administration Cancer Care Network 405-917-0600