Date: Tue, 08 Jul 1997 01:38:08 -0700 From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com> To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de (Joerg Wunsch) Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: no SYSVSHM in GENERIC now.. Message-ID: <24626.868351088@time.cdrom.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 08 Jul 1997 09:14:50 %2B0200." <19970708091450.QL25215@uriah.heep.sax.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> ...where jkh added them. jkh seems to operate a lot on forgotten > branches, and afterwards wonders why the bits didn't wander into the > HEAD theirselves. :) Yeah yeah, well. What can I say? :) > But Jordan, don't add SYSVMSG, almost nobody uses them. They are > really non-generic in a world that can use sockets to pass messages. > (I know that there are differences, but nevertheless, they are not in > wide use.) > > Even SYSVSEM is arguable, i think the only `canned' application that > uses them is PEX. (Who uses PEX, anyway? :) I was thinking actually of just SYSVSHM so I don't have to see the X server whining all the time (or hear people reporting this). Jordan
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?24626.868351088>