From owner-cvs-all Thu Oct 24 12:34:49 2002 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 578BC37B401; Thu, 24 Oct 2002 12:34:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from thuvia.demon.co.uk (thuvia.demon.co.uk [193.237.34.248]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C77EF43E7B; Thu, 24 Oct 2002 12:34:45 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mark@thuvia.demon.co.uk) Received: from dotar.thuvia.org (dotar.thuvia.org [10.0.0.4]) by phaidor.thuvia.org (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g9OJYLcF046666; Thu, 24 Oct 2002 20:34:21 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mark@thuvia.demon.co.uk) Received: from dotar.thuvia.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by dotar.thuvia.org (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id g9OJYLH5046149; Thu, 24 Oct 2002 20:34:21 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mark@dotar.thuvia.org) Received: (from mark@localhost) by dotar.thuvia.org (8.12.6/8.12.6/Submit) id g9OJYLQB046148; Thu, 24 Oct 2002 20:34:21 +0100 (BST) Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 20:34:21 +0100 (BST) From: Mark Valentine Message-Id: <200210241934.g9OJYLQB046148@dotar.thuvia.org> In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Mail User's Shell (7.2.6 beta(5) 10/07/98) To: phk@critter.freebsd.dk (Poul-Henning Kamp), Bruce Evans Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/lib/libdisk Makefile chunk.c write_alpha_disk.c write_i386_disk.c write_pc98_disk.c Cc: Bakul Shah , Takahashi Yoshihiro , cvs-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > From: phk@critter.freebsd.dk (Poul-Henning Kamp) > Date: Thu 24 Oct, 2002 > Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/lib/libdisk Makefile chunk.c write_alpha_disk.c write_i386_disk.c write_pc98_disk.c > Please stop the FUD Bruce. I think it's a real issue. One of the first things I do on some of my systems after installation is delete the unnecessary encoding of the partition/slice/whatever number in /etc/fstab, after being inconvenienced one two many times by that number changing from under me due to the activity of non-FreeBSD stuff. > First of all, this is no longer architecture dependent. You can > use MBR's on your sparc64 if you for some reason feel like it. That's all very well, but it doesn't mean that DOS-style partition numbers have to be forced on the vast majority of people for whom they are irrelevant (i.e. everyone who has no more than one BSD disklabel on a disk). If you want to replace the BSD disklabel with another partitioning scheme, fair enough, but why retain two levels of partitioning in that case (except where required for compatibilty)? OK, the current notation isn't very elegant for the obscure case of more than 26 partitions on a disk, but I can envisage a new partition numbering scheme working alongside the existing ones for compatibility, e.g. map as follows: da0a -> da0p0 da0b -> da0p1 da0c -> da0 da0d -> da0p2 da0e -> da0p3 ... Cheers, Mark. -- Mark Valentine, Thuvia Labs "Tigers will do ANYTHING for a tuna fish sandwich." Mark Valentine uses "We're kind of stupid that way." *munch* *munch* and endorses FreeBSD -- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message