From owner-freebsd-security Wed Nov 13 13:10:45 1996 Return-Path: owner-security Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id NAA16600 for security-outgoing; Wed, 13 Nov 1996 13:10:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu (halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu [18.26.0.159]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id NAA16579 for ; Wed, 13 Nov 1996 13:10:29 -0800 (PST) Received: by halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu; (5.65v3.2/1.1.8.2/19Aug95-0530PM) id AA20266; Wed, 13 Nov 1996 16:08:25 -0500 Date: Wed, 13 Nov 1996 16:08:25 -0500 From: Garrett Wollman Message-Id: <9611132108.AA20266@halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu> To: Poul-Henning Kamp Cc: Bill Paul , will.kempf@firstdatacorp.com (Will Kempf), freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Re[2]: Secure RPC revisited In-Reply-To: <1712.847918392@critter.tfs.com> References: <199611132024.PAA25119@skynet.ctr.columbia.edu> <1712.847918392@critter.tfs.com> Sender: owner-security@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk < said: > The other one is to call the DoD, who is more than eager to show how > much the damage to national safety would be, if you could export > sources for encryption tools, and who is looking for cases... DoD doesn't really care much. (The Intelligence Community doesn't much care either...they can read anything encrypted with DES anyway.) It's the State Department who care the most (because it's their bailiwick), with support from the Justice Department (because they don't want anyone to have privacy and see export controls as a way to discourage development of all crypto software). -GAWollman -- Garrett A. Wollman | O Siem / We are all family / O Siem / We're all the same wollman@lcs.mit.edu | O Siem / The fires of freedom Opinions not those of| Dance in the burning flame MIT, LCS, ANA, or NSA| - Susan Aglukark and Chad Irschick