From owner-freebsd-net Thu May 14 05:14:20 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id FAA15746 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Thu, 14 May 1998 05:14:20 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from localhost.zilker.net (jump-k56flex-0093.jumpnet.com [207.8.6.93]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id FAA15483; Thu, 14 May 1998 05:13:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marquard@zilker.net) Received: (from marquard@localhost) by localhost.zilker.net (8.8.8/8.8.3) id HAA13811; Thu, 14 May 1998 07:13:06 -0500 (CDT) To: Ollivier Robert Cc: core@FreeBSD.ORG, net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: INRIA IPv6 on FreeBSD References: <348.894984380@time.cdrom.com> <19980513005824.B17879@keltia.freenix.fr> From: Dave Marquardt Date: 14 May 1998 07:13:06 -0500 In-Reply-To: Ollivier Robert's message of "Wed, 13 May 1998 00:58:24 +0200" Message-ID: <85somdhwz1.fsf@localhost.zilker.net> Lines: 18 X-Mailer: Quassia Gnus v0.22/XEmacs 19.16 - "Lille" Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Ollivier Robert writes: > According to Jordan K. Hubbard: > > discuss commonalities of implementation? As Garrett said, things > > which are pertinent to _both_ implementations would certainly be more > > than welcome at this time. > > If I remember well, there are at least two WIDE implementations, one > kernel-based and one using a user-mode daemon. I've not tried the WIDE ones > but the INRIA code is heavily used in France where FreeBSD is one of the > most used IPv6 platforms... > > FWIW IBM has chosen the INRIA as its IPv6 stack for AIX. Yes. At the time of the choice, WIDE wasn't really available yet, so it was INRIA vs. NRL. I sent another note that talked about how we ended up with INRIA rather than NRL. -Dave To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message