From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 27 21:46:57 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DA7D16A4CE for ; Mon, 27 Dec 2004 21:46:57 +0000 (GMT) Received: from nagual.pp.ru (pobrecita.freebsd.ru [194.87.13.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83DE743D45 for ; Mon, 27 Dec 2004 21:46:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ache@nagual.pp.ru) Received: from nagual.pp.ru (ache@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nagual.pp.ru (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id iBRLkoqn040782; Tue, 28 Dec 2004 00:46:50 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from ache@nagual.pp.ru) Received: (from ache@localhost) by nagual.pp.ru (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id iBRLkope040781; Tue, 28 Dec 2004 00:46:50 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from ache) Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2004 00:46:50 +0300 From: Andrey Chernov To: "Pedro F. Giffuni" , Poul-Henning Kamp , freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG, samy@kerneled.org Message-ID: <20041227214649.GB40679@nagual.pp.ru> Mail-Followup-To: Andrey Chernov , "Pedro F. Giffuni" , Poul-Henning Kamp , freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG, samy@kerneled.org References: <41CA6B7A.5040500@asme.org> <20041223045854.GA2637@nagual.pp.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20041223045854.GA2637@nagual.pp.ru> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-AntiVirus: checked by AntiVir Milter (version: 1.1.0-3; AVE: 6.29.0.5; VDF: 6.29.0.37; host: nagual.pp.ru) X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.5.6 (nagual.pp.ru [127.0.0.1]); Tue, 28 Dec 2004 00:46:51 +0300 (MSK) Subject: Re: The recent TIOCREMOTE removal X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2004 21:46:57 -0000 On Thu, Dec 23, 2004 at 07:58:55AM +0300, Andrey Chernov wrote: > > >Ignoring the fact that many operating systems have TIOCREMOTE implemented > > >(meaning, FreeBSD provides a nice new portability issue for now and the > > >unknowing future), several ports are *already* broken due to this. > > > > I'm only aware of two ? And I'm currently investigating them. > > TIOCREMOTE removal should be backed out by any means. It is intensively > used in emulators etc. Try to search google to see how many. No responce? In that case I plan to back this change out by myself (after few days timeout for reply). -- http://ache.pp.ru/