From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 27 18:55:50 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7AAC4A6C for ; Wed, 27 Aug 2014 18:55:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bravo.jonathanprice.org (bravo.jonathanprice.org [5.135.154.174]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 397333B0E for ; Wed, 27 Aug 2014 18:55:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bravo.jonathanprice.org (Postfix, from userid 58) id 24D981E01; Wed, 27 Aug 2014 18:55:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.150] (host86-156-241-97.range86-156.btcentralplus.com [86.156.241.97]) by bravo.jonathanprice.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A52571DFB; Wed, 27 Aug 2014 18:55:40 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=jonathanprice.org; s=default; t=1409165740; bh=0RbnzsEjIRLh117PcrC7vg5vaPdiAX/q+YYbAkbLy8c=; h=Date:From:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=i7MKNDOjWqzUxXYlg44Xakfn2KirLI5/NAQ0sFGQEja3oe6Hdf9A9OKFEm2Ri/is9 uBOboa7fZGHnc6+BGOC4hcpEU987jY8eNHb4l3sVSpRdr9EV1QYZbjJep7Oiu707K9 /mWqZlxVTrkFcsetktaIXCtEovZIJBiDxO3OpXKs= Message-ID: <53FE29A8.1000909@jonathanprice.org> Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 19:55:36 +0100 From: Jonathan Price User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kevin Oberman Subject: Re: Should I be using ipv6_activate_all_interfaces or ip6addrctl_policy="ipv6_prefer" References: <88a42e1006e3fac7508a9419e342f1b2@mail.jonathanprice.org> <2173103.SJdXL7NPLT@overcee.wemm.org> <53FD7B34.1050408@jonathanprice.org> <2c1d74944371a4be730ff1b666489467@mail.jonathanprice.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 18:55:50 -0000 > I was over-simplifying and, as you state, any interface explicitly > configured for IPv6 will have IPv6 disabled. Those with explicit IPv6 > configuration will not be disabled. > > Most end-user systems are NOT configured with an address. In most cases > SLAAC (and, perhaps DHCPv6) along with things like NDP and RTSOL do > allof hte configuration. If ipv6_activate_)all_interfaces is NO, only > explicitly configured interfaces will run IPv6. If it i YES, any > interface with no explicit configuration will auto-configure and run IPv6. > > The system I am typing this on is entirely auto-configured as are almost > all Windows systems running 7 or 8. (Maybe Vista, too. Don't recall.) > -- > R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer, Retired > E-mail: rkoberman@gmail.com Ah, thanks, that makes sense. Would that mean that a line such as 'ifconfig_IF="DHCP"' would not count the interface as being explicitly configured? I haven't looked into SLAAC or DHCPv6 configuration yet, so I'm not sure if either of those require a line like the one above. I couldn't word that particularly well. Basically, my question is, does any "ifconfig_IF_..." line count IF as being explicitly configured, or is it just interfaces with statically assigned addresses? Thanks, Jonathan.