From owner-freebsd-alpha Fri Dec 7 13: 0:40 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org Received: from saruman.xwin.net (saruman.xwin.net [205.219.158.250]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F5D637B416 for ; Fri, 7 Dec 2001 13:00:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (dp@localhost) by saruman.xwin.net (8.11.4/8.9.1) with ESMTP id fB7L0mW13153; Fri, 7 Dec 2001 15:00:48 -0600 Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2001 15:00:48 -0600 (CST) From: Paul Halliday X-X-Sender: To: Bernd Walter Cc: Subject: Re: strange.. In-Reply-To: <20011207041632.E93455@cicely8.cicely.de> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Fri, 7 Dec 2001, Bernd Walter wrote: > On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 08:18:59PM -0600, Paul Halliday wrote: > > Just trying to clean up my disks a bit so I ran make clean in /usr/ports. > > Yeah I have installed a few packages, but it has been running since last > > night prolly ~20hrs so far. > > > > Seems odd. > > > > PC164 500mhz, 264MB ram. > > ad0: 6149MB [13328/15/63] at ata0-master WDMA2 > > ad1: 2014MB [4092/16/63] at ata0-slave WDMA2 > > The IDE controller on an PC164 board is very CPU intensive. Could you define "intensive" here. To the point of being counter productive, not efficient, my grandma could do it faster without breaking a sweat intensive? Should I be utilising some other means of magnetic storage?? > And make clean is doing all dependencies everytime. Sounds kinda superfluous, shouldn't make clean take advantage of some check so that it is not doing all dependencies every time? > > > -- > B.Walter COSMO-Project http://www.cosmo-project.de > ticso@cicely.de Usergroup info@cosmo-project.de To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message