From nobody Mon Jan 1 15:17:51 2024 X-Original-To: freebsd-current@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4T3fmK1xy9z56vmK for ; Mon, 1 Jan 2024 15:19:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from warlock@phouka1.phouka.net) Received: from phouka1.phouka.net (phouka1.phouka.net [107.170.196.116]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "phouka.net", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certificate Authority - G2" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4T3fmJ6LfTz4pPK; Mon, 1 Jan 2024 15:19:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from warlock@phouka1.phouka.net) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none Received: from phouka1.phouka.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by phouka1.phouka.net (8.17.1/8.17.1) with ESMTPS id 401FHpPY073225 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 1 Jan 2024 07:17:51 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from warlock@phouka1.phouka.net) Received: (from warlock@localhost) by phouka1.phouka.net (8.17.1/8.17.1/Submit) id 401FHpLM073224; Mon, 1 Jan 2024 07:17:51 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from warlock) Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2024 07:17:51 -0800 From: John Kennedy To: Kurt Jaeger Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ZFS problems since recently ? Message-ID: References: List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-current List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Rspamd-Pre-Result: action=no action; module=replies; Message is reply to one we originated X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:14061, ipnet:107.170.192.0/18, country:US] X-Spamd-Bar: ---- X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4T3fmJ6LfTz4pPK On Mon, Jan 01, 2024 at 02:27:17PM +0100, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > Do you have > vfs.zfs.dmu_offset_next_sync=0 I didn't initially, I do now. Like I said, I haven't been following that one 100%. I know it isn't block-clone per say, so much as some underlying problem it pokes with a pointy stick. Small chance multiplied by a bunch of ZFS IOPS. Seems like I'd have to revert it all the way back to fresh install if I want to get rid of all potential corruption unrelated to sysctl panic. But I'll do myh busy-work cycle (*) with that one and maybe another with it off and see what happens. * full kernel+world, plus my local poudriere package build, currenly wedged a bit with the heimdall build issue.