From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Aug 11 19:52:22 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id TAA03478 for freebsd-hackers-outgoing; Tue, 11 Aug 1998 19:52:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from echonyc.com (echonyc.com [198.67.15.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id TAA03471 for ; Tue, 11 Aug 1998 19:52:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from benedict@echonyc.com) Received: from localhost (benedict@localhost) by echonyc.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id WAA07251; Tue, 11 Aug 1998 22:51:47 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 1998 22:51:46 -0400 (EDT) From: Snob Art Genre Reply-To: ben@rosengart.com To: Terry Lambert cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: KERNFS and MFS In-Reply-To: <199808120243.TAA06610@usr01.primenet.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, 12 Aug 1998, Terry Lambert wrote: > > The console has a message from the swap pager suggesting that 190 MB > > isn't enough. Also a message from the kernel telling me that sh exited > > on signal 11. > > This is the "you've been out of swap, now you must restart things" bug. > > It is definitely a bug, since you are no longer out of swap. What's also definitely a bug is the way sendmail died on signal 11 about every fifteen minutes thereafter, until I killed it normally and restarted it. > > Also, does anyone know how compiling without -pipe interacts with MFS? > > I wonder if MFS is faster or slower than piping. > > Pipe is faster; it avoids the VFS code. Thanks. Ben "You have your mind on computers, it seems." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message