From owner-svn-src-head@freebsd.org Sat Jul 7 15:24:59 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-head@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 897EE102B689; Sat, 7 Jul 2018 15:24:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net) Received: from pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net (br1.CN84in.dnsmgr.net [69.59.192.140]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EEB1B7C3D3; Sat, 7 Jul 2018 15:24:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net) Received: from pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id w67FOuht057576; Sat, 7 Jul 2018 08:24:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from freebsd@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net) Received: (from freebsd@localhost) by pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id w67FOu0F057575; Sat, 7 Jul 2018 08:24:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from freebsd) From: "Rodney W. Grimes" Message-Id: <201807071524.w67FOu0F057575@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net> Subject: Re: svn commit: r336025 - in head/sys: amd64/include i386/include In-Reply-To: To: Warner Losh Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2018 08:24:56 -0700 (PDT) CC: Don Lewis , "Rodney W. Grimes" , Hans Petter Selasky , src-committers , svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org Reply-To: rgrimes@freebsd.org X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL121h (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Jul 2018 15:24:59 -0000 ... Applied the context axe ... > > > > A good reason for continuing UP support on x86 is to make it easy to > > test UP builds in the MI parts of the kernel so that we don't break > > things for the embedded architectures. Unfortunately "make universe" > > currently doesn't have any UP kernels, so I've managed to commit changes > > that break UP builds and not known it until I received reports of broken > > builds from other users > > > > UP kernels have not changed. The setups that have UP kernels generally need > custom ones anyway, since there's so many devices that aren't used. Those > setups aren't affected by this change. > > You raise an interesting point, though: it hasn't been important enough to > the project to include a UP kernel in CI testing we've done for years and > years... Should we add GENERIC-UP to atleast i386 and amd64 and include this in the universe target? Or perhaps teach LINT to also make LINT-UP? Regards, -- Rod Grimes rgrimes@freebsd.org