From owner-svn-src-all@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 29 18:14:49 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8B4B106566B; Fri, 29 May 2009 18:14:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@freebsd.org) Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 597F78FC12; Fri, 29 May 2009 18:14:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@freebsd.org) Received: from porto.topspin.kiev.ua (porto-e.starpoint.kiev.ua [212.40.38.100]) by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id VAA25625; Fri, 29 May 2009 21:14:46 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from avg@freebsd.org) Received: from localhost.topspin.kiev.ua ([127.0.0.1] helo=edge.pp.kiev.ua) by porto.topspin.kiev.ua with esmtp (Exim 4.34 (FreeBSD)) id 1MA6bN-000AW5-MZ; Fri, 29 May 2009 21:14:45 +0300 Message-ID: <4A202614.7060609@freebsd.org> Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 21:14:44 +0300 From: Andriy Gapon User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090406) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Niclas Zeising References: <200905291442.n4TEg290077819@svn.freebsd.org> <4A2016DC.80001@gmail.com> <4A2018BA.9040305@freebsd.org> <4A201AA4.2080106@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4A201AA4.2080106@gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: svn-src-stable@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-stable-7@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r193040 - stable/7 X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for " user" and " projects" \)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 18:14:50 -0000 on 29/05/2009 20:25 Niclas Zeising said the following: > Andriy Gapon wrote: >> on 29/05/2009 20:09 Niclas Zeising said the following: >>> Is it possible to get something along this line in 8-CURRENT as well? I >>> accidentally removed btxld once and when I was building world it stopped >>> in sys/boot because it was missing. I had to manually build and install >>> it before i could continue with my buildworld, which was a bit annoying. >> >> Short answer: no, it was your fault :-) >> >> Long answer: possibly - there are a number of tools that are always used >> from /usr/obj (so to speak), but some other tools are used that way only >> if there is a good reason to do so. But I think that we could always use >> those latter tools from /usr/obj, I don't see why we couldn't. > > Obviously it was my fault, and had it bin cc or make I wouldn't have > complained, but it's such a small utility, I didn't even know it existed > or that it was needed... I was just asking, I apologize if I sounded a > bit angry in the previous mail. Oh, not at all. I started to wonder myself why such small tools couldn't always (unconditionally) be build-tools. Would save some hassle in cases like this. And I don't see any down-side. Anyone? -- Andriy Gapon