From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 2 12:42:48 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45E1B884 for ; Fri, 2 Nov 2012 12:42:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stephen@missouri.edu) Received: from wilberforce.math.missouri.edu (wilberforce.math.missouri.edu [128.206.184.213]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AE718FC15 for ; Fri, 2 Nov 2012 12:42:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (wilberforce.math.missouri.edu [128.206.184.213]) by wilberforce.math.missouri.edu (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id qA2CRii3071071 for ; Fri, 2 Nov 2012 07:27:44 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from stephen@missouri.edu) Message-ID: <5093BC40.8@missouri.edu> Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2012 07:27:44 -0500 From: Stephen Montgomery-Smith User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121028 Thunderbird/16.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FORTRAN vs. Fortran (was: November 5th is Clang-Day) References: <201211021021.qA2ALJLF020996@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> In-Reply-To: <201211021021.qA2ALJLF020996@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2012 12:42:48 -0000 On 11/02/2012 05:21 AM, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2012 17:08:18 +1100 > From: "Greg 'groggy' Lehey" > To: Erich Dollansky > Subject: FORTRAN vs. Fortran (was: November 5th is Clang-Day) > > On Friday, 2 November 2012 at 12:21:03 +0700, Erich Dollansky wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Thu, 1 Nov 2012 21:59:17 -0700 > > Steve Kargl wrote: > >> > >> BTW, the name of the language is "Fortran". It's been "Fortran" > >> for the last 30-something years. > > > > I never realised the name change. It seems that I am not alone with > > this. > > Nor I. Looking at the Wikipedia page, I discover that it had been > spelt "Fortran" as early as 1956, and there's even a copy of the 1956 > Fortran manual online: http://www.fortran.com/FortranForTheIBM704.pdf > Interesting reading. > > come on guys, fortran is not case sensitive... caNyO usti llputw hitespa cewhere ever you like in for TraN?