From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Feb 20 17:39:45 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A08016A4CF
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Sun, 20 Feb 2005 17:39:45 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from wm1.todt.org (wm2.todt.org [207.218.27.21])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BB82243D46
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Sun, 20 Feb 2005 17:39:43 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from jachmann@unitix.org)
Received: (qmail 8686 invoked from network); 20 Feb 2005 17:39:41 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO hurx.thc) (213.23.225.89)
  by 0 with SMTP; 20 Feb 2005 17:39:41 -0000
Received: (qmail 80329 invoked by uid 1001); 20 Feb 2005 17:39:41 -0000
Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2005 18:39:41 +0100
From: Christian Jachmann <Jachmann@unitix.org>
To: David Schultz <das@FreeBSD.ORG>
Message-ID: <20050220173941.GA25298@hurx.thc>
References: <20050219141530.GA67861@hurx.thc>
	<20050219225100.GA16028@VARK.MIT.EDU>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20050219225100.GA16028@VARK.MIT.EDU>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 12:45:58 +0000
cc: current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Load over 1000
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2005 17:39:45 -0000

On Sat, Feb 19, 2005 at 05:51:01PM -0500, David Schultz wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 19, 2005, Christian Jachmann wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > seems that vm.loadavg cant grow over 1024
> > seems that there is a bug
> 
> Yes, see the comments in sys/param.h.  I'm sorry that you were
> unable to accurately measure how much of your foot you're capable
> of shooting off.

Ja, found it... 

so load over 1024 should not be usual, right?
it should't occur in ordinary practice.
I'm currently testing ULE-scheduler under high load works like a charme.

Thanks for the hint

--
Christian Jachmann