From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 29 20:32:34 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A87916AAC9 for ; Mon, 29 May 2006 20:32:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from pooker.samsco.org (pooker.samsco.org [168.103.85.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94F2E43D7C for ; Mon, 29 May 2006 20:32:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from [192.168.254.14] (imini.samsco.home [192.168.254.14]) (authenticated bits=0) by pooker.samsco.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k4TKWOsC071302; Mon, 29 May 2006 14:32:29 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Message-ID: <447B5A43.4000707@samsco.org> Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 14:32:03 -0600 From: Scott Long User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.7.7) Gecko/20050416 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Maxim Sobolev References: <447AB34C.4030509@sippysoft.com> In-Reply-To: <447AB34C.4030509@sippysoft.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=3.8 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=failed version=3.1.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.1 (2006-03-10) on pooker.samsco.org Cc: "current@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Importing iSCSI target from NetBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 20:32:38 -0000 Maxim Sobolev wrote: > Hi, > > I wonder if anybody has any objections to importing iSCSI target daemon > from NetBSD (Intel) into the base. > > -Maxim Yes. I'm nearing completion of locking CAM, and adding new subsystems is not going to help that effort at the moment. I'd also like you to talk with Matt Jacob and Nate Lawson about it since they have quite a bit of current experience with the SCSI target side of things. So in other words, a drive-by commit is not welcome and will be drive-by uncommitted unless you work with the people who can provide help and guidance. Scott