From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 7 15:16:13 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FAD437B401; Wed, 7 May 2003 15:16:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from harmony.village.org (rover.bsdimp.com [204.144.255.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68E5F43F85; Wed, 7 May 2003 15:16:08 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from localhost (warner@rover2.village.org [10.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.12.8/8.12.3) with ESMTP id h47MG5Tl013185; Wed, 7 May 2003 16:16:05 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Date: Wed, 07 May 2003 16:12:49 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <20030507.161249.84050873.imp@bsdimp.com> To: DougB@freebsd.org From: "M. Warner Losh" In-Reply-To: <20030506214845.X5620@znfgre.qbhto.arg> References: <20030506002824.G666@znfgre.qbhto.arg> <1052215193.41902.130.camel@watchtower.office.parksmediagroup.com> <20030506214845.X5620@znfgre.qbhto.arg> X-Mailer: Mew version 2.1 on Emacs 21.2 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Bridge config in /etc/rc (patch) X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 May 2003 22:16:13 -0000 In message: <20030506214845.X5620@znfgre.qbhto.arg> Doug Barton writes: : On Tue, 6 May 2003, Benjamin F. Burke wrote: : : > On Tue, 2003-05-06 at 02:50, Doug Barton wrote: : > > True, but that's another step down the road of "How do we deal with the : > > issue of $BIGNUM conf options in a way that users can handle?" Our current : > > solution for that is to include them all in /etc/defaults/rc.conf, and : > > mostly in rc.conf.5. I'm not sure that solution scales, but I'm equally : > > uncomfortable with the idea of UNdocumented options. : > : > I wonder how many experienced freebsd users really dislike having to : > use the current rc.conf setup. : : Experienced users can fend for themselves regarding edge cases like bridge : configurations. That's what rc.local is for. I'm worried about not : overwhelming new users. Actually, after spending some time last night setting up a bridge, I'd be very happy to have these knobs. It will become a more common case as more people build FreeBSD wireless access points. Warner