From owner-freebsd-current  Tue May 21 19:45:16 1996
Return-Path: owner-current
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id TAA28666
          for current-outgoing; Tue, 21 May 1996 19:45:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hq.icb.chel.su (icb-rich-gw.icb.chel.su [193.125.10.34])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id TAA28616;
          Tue, 21 May 1996 19:44:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (babkin@localhost) by hq.icb.chel.su (8.7.5/8.6.5) id IAA11461; Wed, 22 May 1996 08:43:34 +0600 (GMT+0600)
From: "Serge A. Babkin" <babkin@hq.icb.chel.su>
Message-Id: <199605220243.IAA11461@hq.icb.chel.su>
Subject: Re: Congrats on CURRENT 5/1 SNAP...  - Reply
To: DARREND@novell.com (Darren Davis)
Date: Wed, 22 May 1996 08:43:33 +0600 (ESD)
Cc: jehamby@lightside.com, jkh@time.cdrom.com, current@freebsd.org,
        hackers@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <s1a17972.012@fromGW> from "Darren Davis" at May 21, 96 08:15:30 am
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23]
Content-Type: text
Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> Don't forget that it is but a short hop from Solaris/x86 ELF binaries to
> UnixWare 2.x ELF binaries.  UnixWare is going to be the future direction
> for SCO, so having the ability to run these binaries would be excellent!
>  Besides, I have many of them I want to run.

BTW, SCO5 already has ELF support and most of its standard utilities
are already compiled in ELF format (I think they did it to use the ELF
shared libraries).

-SB