From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 23 10:31:41 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CD7216A419; Sun, 23 Dec 2007 10:31:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hselasky@c2i.net) Received: from swip.net (mailfe08.swip.net [212.247.154.225]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9B1113C469; Sun, 23 Dec 2007 10:31:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hselasky@c2i.net) X-Cloudmark-Score: 0.000000 [] Received: from [193.217.102.3] (account mc467741@c2i.net HELO [10.0.0.105]) by mailfe08.swip.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.13) with ESMTPA id 739633548; Sun, 23 Dec 2007 11:31:39 +0100 From: Hans Petter Selasky To: Alfred Perlstein Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2007 11:32:20 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <5386.1198395886@critter.freebsd.dk> <200712230944.29301.hselasky@c2i.net> <20071223092941.GV16982@elvis.mu.org> In-Reply-To: <20071223092941.GV16982@elvis.mu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200712231132.22576.hselasky@c2i.net> Cc: Poul-Henning Kamp , freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: More leaves on the device tree ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2007 10:31:41 -0000 On Sunday 23 December 2007, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > I think we're getting a little off track of the TODO items > for the inclusion of the usb code. > > I think the original post mentions that devinfo(?) works for > the time being, although perhaps some work later on presentation > could be done. > > Let's stick with devinfo and hit up the next tasks on the > inclusion list. > > I think the next thing is the SMP locking? Or do you have > anything you have in mind from the list you would like to > tackle next? No, just go ahead. What needs to be done about SMP locking ? --HPS