Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2022 09:55:36 +0200 From: Emmanuel Vadot <manu@bidouilliste.com> To: Stefan Esser <se@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Emmanuel Vadot <manu@FreeBSD.org>, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org, dev-commits-ports-all@FreeBSD.org, dev-commits-ports-main@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: git: d540ef54663a - main - graphics/drm-54-kmod: Marked as ignore for FreeBSD HEAD Message-ID: <20220803095536.57adf64bd1d25cf0a647d692@bidouilliste.com> In-Reply-To: <27a4454b-e1a3-d025-6a8c-55c45fac7307@FreeBSD.org> References: <202208021536.272Favjp083685@gitrepo.freebsd.org> <49fe8d87-33ab-612a-7da1-a83ea4d7ffe8@FreeBSD.org> <20220802180828.c49cf690d956d8fdce42cbd0@bidouilliste.com> <27a4454b-e1a3-d025-6a8c-55c45fac7307@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 2 Aug 2022 20:38:08 +0200 Stefan Esser <se@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > Am 02.08.22 um 18:08 schrieb Emmanuel Vadot: > > On Tue, 2 Aug 2022 17:59:04 +0200 > > Stefan Esser <se@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > > > >> Am 02.08.22 um 17:36 schrieb Emmanuel Vadot: > [...] > >>> graphics/drm-54-kmod: Marked as ignore for FreeBSD HEAD > >>> > >>> Everyone should use graphics/drm-510-kmod on Current. > >>> > >>> Sponsored by: Beckhoff Automation GmbH & Co. KG > >> > >> Yes, everybody should use drm-510-kmod on HEAD, too bad that > >> it still does not work with AMD GPUs: > >> > >> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=262043 > >> > >> Please revert until version 5.10 works for all relevant GPUs! > >> > >> Regards, STefan > > > > It doesn't not work with *your* amdgpu, works perfectly fine here on > > multiple amdgpu. > > Do you have an AMD GPU that works with 5.10? As said above yes. > When I opened the PR, I got a number of me-too replies I don't see how this could have helped me that you had some me-too replies in private ... > I'm definitely not the only one affected. > I do assume that other -CURRENT users with > AMD graphics cards continue to use drm-54-kmod (as I do). Do not assume, I assumed that everyone on current was using 510 (as it's the default version in graphics/drm-kmod) and it looked like I was wrong. > There is no reason to make drm-54-kmod fail on -CURRENT for those users > that still cannot use drm-510-kmod. I'll be pushing some linuxkpi code that will make 5.4 fail to compile in a few days and I really don't have the manpower to keep 2 branches (3 if you count master) alive. > When the package is no longer built > on -CURRENT, "pkg upgrade" will just remove drm-54-kmod on -CURRENT > systems when it is no longer provided by the package mirrors. > I'd consider that a violation of POLA, especially since drm-54-kmod > continues to work just fine on -CURRENT and continues to be supported > on -STABLE. > > > Please open a bug on github.com/freebsd/drm-kmod with all the info > > asked so I can see if I can help more. > > I have opened a FreeBSD PR with all the information I have, back in > February, and you have known about it. On 2022-02-19 you added a > comment to this PR where you state that you have no AMD GPU to test > the DRM code with). No, I said that I didn't had any GPU that uses the i2c bitbang code. > I'll open an issue on GitHub with the same information, but I consider > the FreeBSD PR the correct place to report issues that affect FreeBSD. > > Regards, STefan > > PS: https://github.com/freebsd/drm-kmod/issues/195 -- Emmanuel Vadot <manu@bidouilliste.com> <manu@freebsd.org>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20220803095536.57adf64bd1d25cf0a647d692>