From owner-freebsd-questions Mon Sep 4 1: 0:46 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from ns.bsag.ch (ns.bsag.ch [195.246.88.210]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 309F537B422 for ; Mon, 4 Sep 2000 01:00:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from hpr@localhost) by ns.bsag.ch (8.9.3/8.9.3/SuSE Linux 8.9.3-0.1) id KAA21742; Mon, 4 Sep 2000 10:00:32 +0200 Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2000 10:00:32 +0200 From: Hanspeter Roth Bsag To: Alfred Perlstein Cc: Roth Bsag , freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ext2fs support robust? Message-ID: <20000904100032.A21607@bs11.bsag.ch> References: <20000903154433.A13312@bs11.bsag.ch> <20000903140003.D18862@fw.wintelcom.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: <20000903140003.D18862@fw.wintelcom.net>; from bright@wintelcom.net on Sun, Sep 03, 2000 at 02:00:03PM -0700 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun, Sep 03, 2000 at 02:00:03PM -0700, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > * Hanspeter Roth Bsag [000903 06:44] wrote: > > Hello, > > > > has somebody experiance in running ext2fs under FreeBsd? > > Can one expect it to be robust? > > Can Ext2fs be exported via NFS with write access? > > (I'm considering replaceing a linux server with home and project fs > > as ext2fs.) > > It's ok, but you're much better off using FreeBSD's native UFS. So what is the difference except performance? (If FreeBSD would offer good Nfs with locking I would convert the file systems later. But in case I will switch back to Linux I want to keep them as ext2fs.) -Hanspeter To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message