From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Oct  4 14:54:09 2004
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id CEBD116A4CE; Mon,  4 Oct 2004 14:54:09 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from postal2.es.net (postal2.es.net [198.128.3.206])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id AE4CE43D45; Mon,  4 Oct 2004 14:54:09 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from oberman@es.net)
Received: from ptavv.es.net ([198.128.4.29])
        by postal2.es.net (Postal Node 2) with ESMTP (SSL) id IBA74465;
        Mon, 04 Oct 2004 07:54:09 -0700
Received: from ptavv (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by ptavv.es.net (Tachyon Server) with ESMTP id 0B4C35D04;
	Mon,  4 Oct 2004 07:54:09 -0700 (PDT)
To: des@des.no (=?iso-8859-1?q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?=)
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 04 Oct 2004 16:40:41 +0200."
             <xzpr7oey2ae.fsf@dwp.des.no> 
Date: Mon, 04 Oct 2004 07:54:09 -0700
From: "Kevin Oberman" <oberman@es.net>
Message-Id: <20041004145409.0B4C35D04@ptavv.es.net>
cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org
cc: Ceri Davies <ceri@submonkey.net>
cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org
cc: Tim Robbins <tjr@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/bin/rm rm.1 rm.c 
X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree <cvs-all.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-all>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-all@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Oct 2004 14:54:09 -0000

> From: des@des.no (=?iso-8859-1?q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?=)
> Date: Mon, 04 Oct 2004 16:40:41 +0200
> Sender: owner-cvs-all@freebsd.org
> 
> Ceri Davies <ceri@submonkey.net> writes:
> > It didn't mention which standard, and I guess from the lack of citation
> > that you have that information to hand either.
> 
> And this is where you'd be wrong.  Check the Austin Group mailing list
> archives and the SCU Defect Report in Aardvark.  This issue has been
> discussed on and off since April 2003.  As far as I can tell, the
> resolution was that "the wording in the current version of the
> standard does not allow this, but future versions will."

Look! I might or might not care about the actual change, but this needs
a REAL commit message. I don't really care if a change is right or wrong
(or, more likely, somewhere in between), there is no excuse for a
meaningless commit message.

Please do a forced commit with a real log entry! Then we can get back to
the discussion of its appropriateness.
-- 
R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer
Energy Sciences Network (ESnet)
Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab)
E-mail: oberman@es.net			Phone: +1 510 486-8634