From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 12 20:09:33 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF6BF16A4CE; Thu, 12 Feb 2004 20:09:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (adsl-64-169-106-71.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [64.169.106.71]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6492343D2F; Thu, 12 Feb 2004 20:09:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 2673D66D0E; Thu, 12 Feb 2004 20:09:31 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 20:09:31 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: Paul Seniura Message-ID: <20040213040929.GA58196@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20040213001703.616C75C3B@techpc04.okladot.state.ok.us> <20040213011324.GA55948@xor.obsecurity.org> <20040213035608.3AA11A38EA@scifi.homeip.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="gBBFr7Ir9EOA20Yy" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040213035608.3AA11A38EA@scifi.homeip.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org cc: Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: need help on CFLAGS in /etc/make.conf please X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 04:09:33 -0000 --gBBFr7Ir9EOA20Yy Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 09:56:08PM -0600, Paul Seniura wrote: >=20 > Hi Kris, >=20 > > On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 06:17:03PM -0600, Paul Seniura wrote: > > >=20 > > > Hi y'all, > > >=20 > > > I'm trying to find a way to do a CFLAGS+=3D'-O' if and only if such a > > > parm was not already provided before 'make' actually runs. > > >=20 > > > I had this coded with the single =3D sign, i.e. without ?=3D or +=3D,= but > > > the process still acts as if +=3D was coded anyway, thus tacking on > > > my -O *after* the port's own CFLAGS. > > >=20 > > > GCC33 docs say the _last_ -O# is the one that will be used. > > >=20 > > > I've seen other discussion on using -O2 but the point seems to be the > > > ports that set -O2 explicitly are likely to work correctly. >=20 > On Thu 12 Feb 2004 17:13:25 -0800, Kris Kennaway replied: > > That's not a good assumption; many ports simply add -O2 (or -O3, or > > -O999) because the authors "want their code to run fast". The set of > > ports for which the authors have run full regression suites for all > > supported versions of gcc and all supported OS and architecture > > combinations is probably the null set. >=20 > Thank you for responding, but I'm *really* not wanting this to > become another discussion on "how high my Oh-levels should be". ;) >=20 > My question for this discussion is specifically how to prevent > overriding a port's own setting for that parm, and to provide a > default setting -O[1] when the port does not set it at all? >=20 > (I'll save my l-o-n-g-e-r reply for later... believe me I have reasons ;) There's no general way. Some ports do ${CFLAGS} -O999, some do -O999 ${CFLAGS}. The ports collection policy is that any port that specifies its own optimization flags by default and uses them in preference to ${CFLAGS} is a bug and must be fixed. Kris --gBBFr7Ir9EOA20Yy Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFALE35Wry0BWjoQKURAvpcAKDKGDBUujGANsAQe14kP20QvXmYQwCgq9NR Qa3FIOi3C/1hcUHcoWWR/Ts= =kfzX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --gBBFr7Ir9EOA20Yy--