Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2022 15:56:01 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org> To: Piotr Kubaj <pkubaj@anongoth.pl> Cc: ports-committers@FreeBSD.org, dev-commits-ports-all@FreeBSD.org, dev-commits-ports-main@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: git: 8ecb1f814114 - main - Revert "lang/rust: Update to 1.63.0" Message-ID: <20220825135601.ixtj6rqqfqzwtmxn@aniel.nours.eu> In-Reply-To: <Ywd8MYHWS9MKCnp3@talos> References: <202208251050.27PAoUmi075877@gitrepo.freebsd.org> <20220825120826.couaapv3odwpjilf@aniel.nours.eu> <YwdpSDVcps/d5MNQ@talos> <20220825132412.vr2vvkxejnqefzq2@aniel.nours.eu> <Ywd8MYHWS9MKCnp3@talos>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 03:42:09PM +0200, Piotr Kubaj wrote: > On 22-08-25 15:24:12, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 02:21:28PM +0200, Piotr Kubaj wrote: > > > On 22-08-25 14:08:26, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > > > On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 10:50:30AM +0000, Piotr Kubaj wrote: > > > > > The branch main has been updated by pkubaj: > > > > > > > > > > URL: https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/ports/commit/?id=8ecb1f8141144c1603eb4026122d2e60eeaccd64 > > > > > > > > > > commit 8ecb1f8141144c1603eb4026122d2e60eeaccd64 > > > > > Author: Piotr Kubaj <pkubaj@FreeBSD.org> > > > > > AuthorDate: 2022-08-25 10:29:24 +0000 > > > > > Commit: Piotr Kubaj <pkubaj@FreeBSD.org> > > > > > CommitDate: 2022-08-25 10:49:36 +0000 > > > > > > > > > > Revert "lang/rust: Update to 1.63.0" > > > > > > > > > > This reverts commit f36cc819accadae1fefc14c203e5fbe9c74e1492. > > > > > > > > > > I asked for an exp-run for powerpc and powerpc64 on a recently provided > > > > > cluster machine but got no reply. > > > > > > > > > > PR: 265915 > > > > > > > > You cannot take the decision to revert on your own for many reasons: > > > > > > > > 1. etiquete: we ask people to actually revert if needed and escalate if they > > > > don't, we never revert directly ourself! the only one allowed to do "rude" revert > > > > are people taking care of the package building when something break the delivery > > > > of packages for Tier 1 > > > I did it myself so that users don't upgrade in the meantime, since that > > > would create further confusion. If I let it wait, then PORTEPOCH should > > > have been bumped for all the affected ports, which I think we all agree > > > would be troublesome. > > > > No what will happen is given it works on Tier1, the Tier2 will fix one by one > > the issues that raised if any without reverting, meaning no PORTEPOCH would be > > needed. > > Isn't it better to fix issues BEFORE committing? Yes if possible in a timely manner, but again this is the life of Tier 2 to be best effort support. And again the problem here is the behaviour, the driven by revert by a committer of the work of another committer, this is not acceptable and have never been accepted in the project. Best regards, Bapt
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20220825135601.ixtj6rqqfqzwtmxn>