Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2005 13:13:24 -0700 From: Adam Weinberger <adamw@magnesium.net> To: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> Cc: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org>, Alexander Leidinger <netchild@FreeBSD.org>, Eric Anholt <eta@lclark.edu>, Michael Nottebrock <lofi@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports CHANGES UPDATING ports/Mk bsd.port.mk ports/accessibility/linux-atk Makefile pkg-plist ports/archivers/stuffit Makefile ports/astro/linux-setiathome Makefile ports/audio/baudline Makefile ports/audio/linux-arts ... Message-ID: <42C05DE4.5050205@magnesium.net> In-Reply-To: <20050627201024.GA13404@soaustin.net> References: <200506172259.j5HMxTad068378@repoman.freebsd.org> <200506251924.24269.lofi@freebsd.org> <42BDF3D9.6000803@magnesium.net> <20050627131305.GA5802@FreeBSD.org> <1119898902.24833.90.camel@leguin> <20050627201024.GA13404@soaustin.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Mark Linimon wrote: > On Mon, Jun 27, 2005 at 12:01:42PM -0700, Eric Anholt wrote: > >>* Do not put new ports in X11BASE if you can avoid it. >>* Move leaf ports to LOCALBASE if you can. > > > Can anyone think of a good reason (other than the hard work that > will be involved) not to try to migrate towards this? If portmgr issues a statement saying "this is what we want to migrate towards," then we can make movement on this. With your portmgr hat on, do you support this? We could even facilitate it by making X11BASE = LOCALBASE in -CURRENT. # Adam -- Adam Weinberger adamw@magnesium.net || adamw@FreeBSD.org adamw@vectors.cx || adamw@gnome.org http://www.vectors.cx
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?42C05DE4.5050205>