From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 17 21:38:09 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A89D1065673 for ; Thu, 17 May 2012 21:38:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sodynet1@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ob0-f182.google.com (mail-ob0-f182.google.com [209.85.214.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD7238FC16 for ; Thu, 17 May 2012 21:38:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by obcni5 with SMTP id ni5so4017494obc.13 for ; Thu, 17 May 2012 14:38:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=gADiGfQYkqUzvhtxd7urc5Ao/T46fi+ERF+sT5aKlq4=; b=QaJhpTbe7Xi/+TVwu6vFlp9UmJSzHn3gQymTHCzSC6zlzNCUGj8Y0zHt0JnvaDrrMc DgD+16hs0Dccuh52LX6BvFZmuZ+rSTpp8EA4doKqwRw/VTYQSEpqDiToPcKN8Dhe7BUg YAj85uZ8imrJeRVoFrzWYK8sTX6Px9D4IBLrL21RuJsKadzRY1zPqZ8hTKDAKBYoBYp8 mX7NZTTbRwOfcuRbxUeJFap8XrAlDEaoDs+ZuWiyAaMxF3guqV/CxHVY0aop+sLUTR4m CqsYLo2sRzTivaYGI0OdYn97rVjoiMjQUjl3mYoukzcoXjQ3lyOzbTjmvcaRcNOU6i/8 F0KQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.115.1 with SMTP id jk1mr7989203obb.75.1337290687308; Thu, 17 May 2012 14:38:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.182.44.101 with HTTP; Thu, 17 May 2012 14:38:07 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4FB4B682.4020606@zhegan.in> <1337276670.15253.2.camel@powernoodle-l7.corp.yahoo.com> Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 00:38:07 +0300 Message-ID: From: Sami Halabi To: "Li, Qing" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" , "Eugene M. Zheganin" , Sean Bruno Subject: Re: ECMP and RADIX_MPATH X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 21:38:09 -0000 Hi, what form of load balancing it makes? is that apply to 8.3-R/S also? thanks, Sami On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 8:56 PM, Li, Qing wrote: > It is not working properly in one case, of load balancing among physical > interfaces having a single prefix, all are attached to the same physical > link, and reaching a single first-hop router. > > The feature itself, of installing (/removing) multiple routing entries of > varying > first-hop to the same destination, and having traffic load balance among > the installed routes work fine. > > --Qing > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd- > > net@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Sean Bruno > > Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2012 10:45 AM > > To: Eugene M. Zheganin > > Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org > > Subject: Re: ECMP and RADIX_MPATH > > > > On Thu, 2012-05-17 at 01:27 -0700, Eugene M. Zheganin wrote: > > > The problem is that this topic lacks the documentation like totally. > > > From the commit comments I understand that with RADIX_MPATH I can > > > use > > > more than one route towards the destination, but I really cannot find > > > anywhere the answer to the question 'will some form of balancing, > > > per-flow or per-packet take place'. > > > > It appears that RADIX_MPATH is currently not working properly. See > > this > > months mail threads [stable-9] where we discussed it. > > > > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/2012-May/032331.html > > > > sean > > > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- Sami Halabi Information Systems Engineer NMS Projects Expert