Date: Tue, 29 May 2012 17:31:45 +0900 From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> To: "Dewayne Geraghty" <dewayne.geraghty@heuristicsystems.com.au> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, 'Matthew Seaman' <matthew@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: clang tautology Message-ID: <m2obp7ie1a.wl%randy@psg.com> In-Reply-To: <DFAB5DB629574C9FABCDA73E04500139@white> References: <m2ehq3snv5.wl%randy@psg.com> <m262bfsl5q.wl%randy@psg.com> <4FC47BB5.7000204@FreeBSD.org> <DFAB5DB629574C9FABCDA73E04500139@white>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Mark Linimon is monitoring the status of ports and clang at > http://blog.vx.sk/archives/25-FreeBSD-Compiler-Benchmark-gcc-base-vs-gcc-ports-vs-clang.html > Which might save you some work. looks like benchmarks, not status of compilability/runability randy
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?m2obp7ie1a.wl%randy>