From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 1 21:09:12 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CED916A41F for ; Thu, 1 Dec 2005 21:09:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freminlins@gmail.com) Received: from nproxy.gmail.com (nproxy.gmail.com [64.233.182.192]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C7F943D68 for ; Thu, 1 Dec 2005 21:09:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freminlins@gmail.com) Received: by nproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id k26so126545nfc for ; Thu, 01 Dec 2005 13:09:07 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=ucUkvrYmGvb7pKzQBgmHyP2XCi6xw3ZKTcV5kJuHY5VfK6ntB2ZwvscoNuz59Lzn/78Y6gPwVRJuoWA68XgMAbINKds2T6WkCV86VminC6MiWs8Li0URIUhvEWYhP4bxlHIgHveWLN+sX3Trbvq72M99Om0F/IDYOSfoTL3RZU4= Received: by 10.49.42.5 with SMTP id u5mr404468nfj; Thu, 01 Dec 2005 13:09:06 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.48.235.2 with HTTP; Thu, 1 Dec 2005 13:09:06 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2005 21:09:06 +0000 From: Freminlins To: "N.J. Thomas" In-Reply-To: <20051201193813.GG15171@ayvali.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20051201193813.GG15171@ayvali.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: overloaded webserver: nfs wait issue? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2005 21:09:12 -0000 Can you provide the output of nfsstat -c 1 on the web servers (and nfsstat -s 1 on the nfs server if they are running FreeBSD)? Run them for a minute when you are getting bad performance. Please also quantify "moderately high traffic". What is this in Mbit/s? Also, it may be helpful to know a little bit about your network infrastructure, i.e. are the switch ports set to full duplex and the machines to match. NFS performance is very dependent on a fast reliable network. Don't consider anything less than 100Mbit/s full duplex. Also what platform is the NFS server? We recently migrated from a cluster pair of NetApps to a single NFS server running FreeBSD. This is mounted by four NFS clients running Zeus. We have = a lot of NFS experience and we felt confident this would work. It did and wit= h the most marginal degradation in performance. Frem.