From owner-freebsd-java Tue Jan 27 12:13:39 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id MAA29422 for java-outgoing; Tue, 27 Jan 1998 12:13:39 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from ns.mt.sri.com (sri-gw.MT.net [206.127.105.141]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id MAA29366 for ; Tue, 27 Jan 1998 12:13:28 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nate@mt.sri.com) Received: from mt.sri.com (rocky.mt.sri.com [206.127.76.100]) by ns.mt.sri.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id NAA23319; Tue, 27 Jan 1998 13:01:00 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from nate@rocky.mt.sri.com) Received: by mt.sri.com (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4) id NAA06231; Tue, 27 Jan 1998 13:00:59 -0700 Date: Tue, 27 Jan 1998 13:00:59 -0700 Message-Id: <199801272000.NAA06231@mt.sri.com> From: Nate Williams MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: "SIVA SANKARAN" Cc: freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Benchmarks !! In-Reply-To: <199801270642.BAA29642@dwarpal.in.oracle.com> References: <199801270642.BAA29642@dwarpal.in.oracle.com> X-Mailer: VM 6.29 under 19.15 XEmacs Lucid Sender: owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > I have currently finished porting JDK 114 on FreeBSD. Is there any > standard > benchmark, you guys are adopting for testing the JDK. I ran Caffeine3.0 > benchmark ( that is > supposed to be a standard benchmark), and got 210 as the result . > I ran it on a Pentium 133MHz , 32 MB RAM , FreeBSD-2.2.2 Release . Wow. That seems incredible, and almost unbelievable. >From a Solaris 2.6 box (Sun Sparc 5 @ 70Mhz, 128MB RAM), JDK1.1.5 from SUN 39 >From a Solaris 2.5.1 box (Sun Ultra 143Mhz, 128MB RAM), JDK1.1.5 from SUN 75 >From a FreeBSD 2.2.5-STABLE (PII-300, 128MB RAM), JDK1.1.5:java-port 224 >From a FreeBSD 2.2.5-STABLE (P-166, 64MB RAM), JDK1.1.5:java-port 103 ( I think , I forgot the numbers, but somewhere around there). >From a FreeBSD 2.2.5-STABLE (PII-300, 128MB RAM), Netscape 3.03 196 > > What I think is , we will adopt to a standard benchmark(Caffeine is a > good choice) and just compare our port performance. In case you have already > ran these tests, can you send the results, so that we can compare. How are you running the benchmark? I'm running them as % java CaffeineMarkApp, and then running all tests locally for the JDK versions, and via runtest.html for appletviewer/Netscape. Nate