From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 9 10:10:11 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C5AA3AF4 for ; Tue, 9 Sep 2014 10:10:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp25.services.sfr.fr (smtp25.services.sfr.fr [93.17.128.120]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 619F4DFE for ; Tue, 9 Sep 2014 10:10:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from filter.sfr.fr (localhost [109.15.114.149]) by msfrf2519.sfr.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 10DC5700008F for ; Tue, 9 Sep 2014 12:03:02 +0200 (CEST) Authentication-Results: sfrmc.priv.atos.fr; dkim=none (no signature); dkim-adsp=none (no policy) header.from=listjm@club-internet.fr Received: from [192.168.1.67] (149.114.15.109.rev.sfr.net [109.15.114.149]) by msfrf2519.sfr.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id C62557000081 for ; Tue, 9 Sep 2014 12:03:01 +0200 (CEST) X-SFR-UUID: 20140909100301811.C62557000081@msfrf2519.sfr.fr Message-ID: <540ED049.8010602@club-internet.fr> Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2014 12:02:49 +0200 From: Juan =?iso-8859-1?b?UmFt824=?= Molina Menor User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: here we go again w/ pkg .... Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2014 10:10:12 -0000 > On 09/08/14 17:46, Matthew Seaman wrote: > >/ On 08/09/2014 22:18, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: > />>/ root at kabini1 , /etc, 4:11:53pm] 568 % pkg version -vIL= > />>/ curl-7.37.1_2 < needs updating (index has 7.37.1_3) > />>/ gtk2-2.24.22_3 < needs updating (index has 2.24.22_4) > />>/ libyaml-0.1.6 < needs updating (index has 0.1.6_1) > />>/ pango-1.34.1_6 < needs updating (index has 1.34.1_7) > />>/ portmaster-3.17.6 < needs updating (index has 3.17.7) > />>/ readline-6.3.6_1 < needs updating (index has 6.3.8) > />>/ [root at kabini1 , /etc, 4:11:57pm] 569 % pkg version -vRL= > />>/ Updating FreeBSD repository catalogue... > />>/ FreeBSD repository is up-to-date. > />>/ Updating FreeBSD_new_xorg repository catalogue... > />>/ FreeBSD_new_xorg repository is up-to-date. > />>/ All repositories are up-to-date. > />>/ db46-4.6.21.4 ? orphaned: databases/db46 > />>/ dri-9.1.7_4,2 > succeeds remote (remote has > />>/ 7.6.1_4,2) > />>/ libGL-9.1.7_1 > succeeds remote (remote has 7.6.1_4) > />>/ libdrm-2.4.52,1 > succeeds remote (remote has > />>/ 2.4.17_1,1) > />>/ linux-f10-expat-2.0.1 ? orphaned: textproc/linux-f10-expat > />>/ linux-f10-fontconfig-2.6.0 ? orphaned: > />>/ x11-fonts/linux-f10-fontconfig > />>/ linux-f10-xorg-libs-7.4_1 ? orphaned: x11/linux-f10-xorg-libs > />>/ opera-linuxplugins-12.16 ? orphaned: www/opera-linuxplugins > />>/ xf86-video-intel-2.21.15_3 > succeeds remote (remote has 2.7.1_8) > />>/ xorg-server-1.12.4_8,1 > succeeds remote (remote has > />>/ 1.7.7_13,1) > />/ It's the 'pkg version -vRL=' output which is pertinent when you're > />/ trying to update using binary packages from the repository. In this > />/ case it is clear that you have already upgraded (by portmaster(8) or > />/ otherwise) using a more recent ports tree -- probably not the one with > />/ the INDEX that shows some out of date packages. There simply aren't any > />/ /newer/ binary packages available that what you already have installed, > />/ so pkg(8) doesn't do anything. > />/ > />/ Cheers, > />/ > />/ Matthew > />/ > / > > > I didn't do an actual ports update, just checked, using: portmaster -L > |/ egrep '(ew|ort) version|total install' .... I guess that's enough to > /mess up pkg ? Why do you persist on the idea there is something messed up? You have a ports tree showing updated versions of some ports and official package repositories which are temporarily lagging behind, that’s all! Hope it helps, Juan