Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2014 12:02:49 +0200 From: Juan =?iso-8859-1?b?UmFt824=?= Molina Menor <listjm@club-internet.fr> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: here we go again w/ pkg .... Message-ID: <540ED049.8010602@club-internet.fr>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On 09/08/14 17:46, Matthew Seaman wrote: > >/ On 08/09/2014 22:18, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: > />>/ root at kabini1 <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, /etc, 4:11:53pm] 568 % pkg version -vIL= > />>/ curl-7.37.1_2 < needs updating (index has 7.37.1_3) > />>/ gtk2-2.24.22_3 < needs updating (index has 2.24.22_4) > />>/ libyaml-0.1.6 < needs updating (index has 0.1.6_1) > />>/ pango-1.34.1_6 < needs updating (index has 1.34.1_7) > />>/ portmaster-3.17.6 < needs updating (index has 3.17.7) > />>/ readline-6.3.6_1 < needs updating (index has 6.3.8) > />>/ [root at kabini1 <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, /etc, 4:11:57pm] 569 % pkg version -vRL= > />>/ Updating FreeBSD repository catalogue... > />>/ FreeBSD repository is up-to-date. > />>/ Updating FreeBSD_new_xorg repository catalogue... > />>/ FreeBSD_new_xorg repository is up-to-date. > />>/ All repositories are up-to-date. > />>/ db46-4.6.21.4 ? orphaned: databases/db46 > />>/ dri-9.1.7_4,2 > succeeds remote (remote has > />>/ 7.6.1_4,2) > />>/ libGL-9.1.7_1 > succeeds remote (remote has 7.6.1_4) > />>/ libdrm-2.4.52,1 > succeeds remote (remote has > />>/ 2.4.17_1,1) > />>/ linux-f10-expat-2.0.1 ? orphaned: textproc/linux-f10-expat > />>/ linux-f10-fontconfig-2.6.0 ? orphaned: > />>/ x11-fonts/linux-f10-fontconfig > />>/ linux-f10-xorg-libs-7.4_1 ? orphaned: x11/linux-f10-xorg-libs > />>/ opera-linuxplugins-12.16 ? orphaned: www/opera-linuxplugins > />>/ xf86-video-intel-2.21.15_3 > succeeds remote (remote has 2.7.1_8) > />>/ xorg-server-1.12.4_8,1 > succeeds remote (remote has > />>/ 1.7.7_13,1) > />/ It's the 'pkg version -vRL=' output which is pertinent when you're > />/ trying to update using binary packages from the repository. In this > />/ case it is clear that you have already upgraded (by portmaster(8) or > />/ otherwise) using a more recent ports tree -- probably not the one with > />/ the INDEX that shows some out of date packages. There simply aren't any > />/ /newer/ binary packages available that what you already have installed, > />/ so pkg(8) doesn't do anything. > />/ > />/ Cheers, > />/ > />/ Matthew > />/ > / > > > I didn't do an actual ports update, just checked, using: portmaster -L > |/ egrep '(ew|ort) version|total install' .... I guess that's enough to > /mess up pkg ? Why do you persist on the idea there is something messed up? You have a ports tree showing updated versions of some ports and official package repositories which are temporarily lagging behind, that’s all! Hope it helps, Juan
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?540ED049.8010602>