From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Jun  8 18:07:13 2009
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B3FC106566C;
	Mon,  8 Jun 2009 18:07:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com)
Received: from harmony.bsdimp.com (bsdimp.com [199.45.160.85])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4B3F8FC15;
	Mon,  8 Jun 2009 18:07:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by harmony.bsdimp.com (8.14.3/8.14.1) with ESMTP id n58I5ZK4032417;
	Mon, 8 Jun 2009 12:05:36 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com)
Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2009 12:05:52 -0600 (MDT)
Message-Id: <20090608.120552.756910862.imp@bsdimp.com>
To: ed@80386.nl
From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>
In-Reply-To: <20090604093831.GE48776@hoeg.nl>
References: <20090604093831.GE48776@hoeg.nl>
X-Mailer: Mew version 5.2 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: hackers@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Clang: now available from a SVN server near you!
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2009 18:07:13 -0000

In message: <20090604093831.GE48776@hoeg.nl>
            Ed Schouten <ed@80386.nl> writes:
: Good news everyone!
...
: So far we've only done testing on amd64 and i386. A lot of ports are
: probably still broken. Caveat emptor. Beware of dog. Slippery when wet.

"objects in mirror may be larger than they appear"

Do you have size or run-time performance comparisons yet?

Warner