From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri Sep 4 10:43:41 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83C5E9CA2B1 for ; Fri, 4 Sep 2015 10:43:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from noname.esst@yahoo.com) Received: from nm4-vm1.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com (nm4-vm1.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com [98.138.91.44]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 53F8B8AB for ; Fri, 4 Sep 2015 10:43:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from noname.esst@yahoo.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1441363052; bh=3YXjyDVxosqhgiKrw6+4y5eHt9KyXAmAlUfvAcYn3Cs=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Subject:From:Subject; b=QGxbJtmXPih7VwMd/5YqigktekAjDp3zSbQXQUddZfV5XIIbqGKpJ3CDLke9dDCK7gTfHOs6s5kNHDIsmS7yxwrAdTZ33JXSs+A78To1xqCjhIjH9LKAo91+xYoQVkAVo1ZtSzCKRT8ZU/Z0YGkBt3eeZFQqH2stIhp4i9kzXIcrOvAh3uL+X7qpDQpdlL2eSu2NNr5ZQFnfHGsHCVmGbHFGACIZD9nAz+ekp9R1FZ21MlPnWnMeSdmpZE0nany9JqbrvY3HemOavRLWPf2KLcuxJeF8NLrx39TlDqYo63CQ0nnur08NrQspTO/VZyqwUmhsGhqqaoFxRUOZXYnU5g== Received: from [98.138.101.132] by nm4.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 04 Sep 2015 10:37:32 -0000 Received: from [98.138.87.5] by tm20.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 04 Sep 2015 10:37:32 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1005.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 04 Sep 2015 10:37:32 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 176579.64844.bm@omp1005.mail.ne1.yahoo.com X-YMail-OSG: ymxtVEQVM1np.37CbZ1Ys8NXXC.st3CmV2qBc76lqrg9.U2higFhK2ljyok.1D0 b8wcF__acyeVBBlSe_ENxkMVXbz481jQ2esW48lCnCmL2DbjVXlj9vP2rZNWs6u8Sb9AXoOD5GiM phPuGTKwUqwhpSjQrvkSlef8MUzBhl_tSTpq_j5rr7_WApXRpLgKyAvjRv1nGr4tY.OscrreIdXz ViprMdG9cqiwU7CR9exkmBrGzHVr6lrln3Pml87EdiTrh2FqkOAtuqDx_cNz72pJyEd3rHt.bS4F QwyEwO.LnaEW69SA.pmgZIVqm7H2n0LKr1PQ5k6NA_CYkO5gd3GpHNh8bQF1O7suOkYOq7ubgOW1 XKHDLLBTFkXQ5QEKfrWLc_tUt4ZKA3pRd.oLhV_fsLoRNPTFDAUaziztDofahY11WErSx8X8E.rL Wj9b9mSnzcQyWtef7pjox3aE16RhWmckoGR0Ugx51nWi6qsSHMi6kA34- Received: by 98.138.105.193; Fri, 04 Sep 2015 10:37:31 +0000 Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2015 10:37:31 +0000 (UTC) From: Nomad Esst Reply-To: Nomad Esst To: "freebsd-drivers@freebsd.org" , FreeBSD Net , Freebsd Hackers List Message-ID: <740628555.1564144.1441363051289.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> Subject: FreeBSD em, igb driver question MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2015 10:43:41 -0000 Hi allDuring some performance tests, we found out some weird problems. We u= se a shell script that do the following : do from 1 to 10Shutdown em/igb interfacesleep 3Bring em/igb interface uptcp= replay -i em0 -l ospf_hello.pcap=C2=A0sleep3end By running this shell on one side we expect 10 ospf hello packets to get ar= rived at the other side, but tcpdump (on the other side) shows 4, sometimes= 8 and etc ... (not all 10 packets are arrived at the other side).We test t= his scenario with a Cisco router, and all packets are received at the Cisco= side. What causes this packet loss in FreeBSD (maybe in em or igb drivers)= ?I know that this scenario may not have any use in the real world, but I'm = curious, why Cisco don't have such behavior.Thanks in advance. Regards. From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri Sep 4 22:24:19 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F4849CAE00 for ; Fri, 4 Sep 2015 22:24:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B1BA669 for ; Fri, 4 Sep 2015 22:24:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id t84MOJ5d034703 for ; Fri, 4 Sep 2015 22:24:19 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 123330] [nsswitch.conf] Enabling samba wins in nsswitch.conf causes sshd, ftpd, etc services to die Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2015 22:24:19 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: conf X-Bugzilla-Version: unspecified X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: timur@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Priority: Normal X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2015 22:24:19 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=123330 --- Comment #3 from Timur I. Bakeyev --- Is this still relevant? Any tries with recent Samba versions? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.