Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 15:29:31 +0200 From: Pav Lucistnik <pav@oook.cz> To: Franz Klammer <klammer@webonaut.com> Cc: FreeBSD GNOME Users <gnome@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: please test gdesklets-0.30 on 4.x Message-ID: <1092662971.476.34.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz> In-Reply-To: <4120A1A5.2060002@webonaut.com> References: <4120A1A5.2060002@webonaut.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-NX4TgSue0vrmnQYBr79N
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
V po, 16. 08. 2004 v 13:59, Franz Klammer p=ED=B9e:
> attached the update-patch for gdesklets-0.30.
> there is still an issue with statfs and -CURRENT which
> should be solved with patch-libdesklets_Disk.py don't know
> if this works also with 4.x.
Does not compile on 4.x:
tiling.c: In function `make_row':
tiling.c:56: syntax error before `const'
tiling.c:58: `q' undeclared (first use in this function)
tiling.c:58: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
tiling.c:58: for each function it appears in.)
gmake[2]: *** [tiling.lo] Error 1
gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/home/pav/cvs/freebsd/ports/deskutils/gdes=
klets/work/gDesklets-0.30/utils'
gmake[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/home/pav/cvs/freebsd/ports/deskutils/gdes=
klets/work/gDesklets-0.30'
gmake: *** [all] Error 2
*** Error code 2
See attached patch for fix, and to prevent swig regenering tiling.i, add
this to post-patch:
@${TOUCH} ${WRKSRC}/utils/tiling_wrap.c
More breakage:
glibtop.c: In function `get_proc_args':
glibtop.c:412: syntax error before `*'
glibtop.c:414: `t' undeclared (first use in this function)
glibtop.c:414: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
glibtop.c:414: for each function it appears in.)
gmake[4]: *** [_glibtopmodule_la-glibtop.lo] Error 1
gmake[4]: Leaving directory `/usr/home/pav/cvs/freebsd/ports/deskutils/gdes=
klets/work/gDesklets-0.30/libdesklets/system'
see attached patch. That's for build, I'll try to install and run it in a m=
oment.
--=20
Pav Lucistnik <pav@oook.cz>
<pav@FreeBSD.org>
lofi> My _sympathetic_ opinion about kdevelop is that it's a huge pile
of shit that might at least work okay if used in Linux.
lofi> My neutral opinion is that it's just a huge pile of shit.
--=-NX4TgSue0vrmnQYBr79N--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1092662971.476.34.camel>