From owner-freebsd-current  Wed Dec  3 19:23:17 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id TAA11571
          for current-outgoing; Wed, 3 Dec 1997 19:23:17 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current)
Received: from rah.star-gate.com (rah.star-gate.com [204.188.121.18])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id TAA11558
          for <current@freebsd.org>; Wed, 3 Dec 1997 19:23:12 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from hasty@rah.star-gate.com)
Received: from rah.star-gate.com (localhost.star-gate.com [127.0.0.1])
          by rah.star-gate.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id TAA02466;
          Wed, 3 Dec 1997 19:22:46 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from hasty@rah.star-gate.com)
Message-Id: <199712040322.TAA02466@rah.star-gate.com>
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0gamma 1/27/96
To: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com>
cc: Kevin Day <toasty@home.dragondata.com>, jak@cetlink.net (John Kelly),
        current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: 3.0 -release ? 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 03 Dec 1997 19:38:51 MST."
             <199712040238.TAA22599@mt.sri.com> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Wed, 03 Dec 1997 19:22:46 -0800
From: Amancio Hasty <hasty@rah.star-gate.com>
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> The people who run the 'OS of the day' aren't that critical to FreeBSD's
> success, since there will *always* be something that causes them to
> switch to another OS.

Lets assume that you are right, what is then critical to FreeBSD's success?

	Amancio