From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 23 04:04:37 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B5A28AC2 for ; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 04:04:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.parts-unknown.org (mail.parts-unknown.org [50.250.218.162]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9AEF2115B for ; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 04:04:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.parts-unknown.org (Postfix, from userid 80) id D0465B340AF6; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 21:04:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.parts-unknown.org (mail.parts-unknown.org [2001:470:67:119::4]) by mail.parts-unknown.org (Horde Framework) with HTTP; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 21:04:29 -0700 Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 21:04:29 -0700 Message-ID: <20150422210429.Horde.HzvF4AYttFWArG_eKtySqQ6@mail.parts-unknown.org> From: David Benfell To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: High LA caused by php-fpm References: <20150415085039.GF1280@xtaz.uk> <20150420233457.Horde.XyjvIrXnoN5DCSO0SMsfUg6@mail.parts-unknown.org> In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Horde Application Framework 5 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=_2jyvEh5zv47TfNElCvVPSA2"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 04:04:37 -0000 This message is in MIME format and has been PGP signed. --=_2jyvEh5zv47TfNElCvVPSA2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; DelSp=Yes Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Quoting Dimitri Minaev : > Sounds reasonable :) Should I also recompile PHP using WITH_OPENSSL_PORT? I suspect you can get away with just rebuilding those ports that=20=20 actually=20depend on openssl, but I would have to defer to those with=20=20 more=20experience on this. What *I* did was portmaster -r openssl and portmaster -Rft php55=20=20 (because=20I'm using php55). This was probably overkill. --=20 David=20Benfell --=_2jyvEh5zv47TfNElCvVPSA2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: PGP Digital Signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAABAgAGBQJVOG9NAAoJEBV64x4SNmArV1cQAKB5+WfxXWluKHIVDJnvQC6T UTEimi3JJcFQ2/qGecMyzRe50Xb8JD12neCPieSOC9EirFmrhuPLQ7CoK23wicLr hpbq3JxtbVBIq/D0ewFxkQwIrWvG8WMNvCS2V3FygQReYTiecMi95Rqimn4KwRuE ehHQOo2d3X6ODIEG83/bby94H5P5PFZvB/zq8ql10wL0RSAxl0FI/lVwUhZCCMUe OKABNoPpFSZyW7b7BqvcZuIMo4+F6vTEm3KTaPcLvAuset14ybjM+kGm/0e/g8p9 3zw3PlALqHdsI3yGsUrUaS01sayPccrcZO3G1Eu+yieyH6KXstjlMAQPdLdCiG8w U6klRabV0wfQ9hy7Y8Nv+VwhJJM7HWfT2KM4lYgSzTyrwhICNVL+IKE0gkIauAYZ ru7IY7uUAMWytHbV4eXPLwjWRoB+JVbI6B5itheOh/Cx/u3dzpW4s0do76301hZ0 dsZNrZR4yRmK+4QVZBDuBbrLh3qrX+UEWO8A0KlZg0Bkoz2cTwRpQCzYVjrEWn1m g/BnCrJXtK1GE6GZ+Y11atNhqrRxHdPXDCEnKzGWbA8ECmjrpkK3/6ZC0nMhGu3i E/QLyPp2k/FVAUhsfcUauphZq4LhrAR1zxYjmWk57yWWW1IdMu2agNwzHrw+zNjb c6xdjrV2zQ2BXp+mRdkx =e/uO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=_2jyvEh5zv47TfNElCvVPSA2--