From owner-svn-ports-all@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 4 07:54:58 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2DC70E9A; Thu, 4 Jun 2015 07:54:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd.contact@marino.st) Received: from shepard.synsport.net (mail.synsport.com [208.69.230.148]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 493C211A9; Thu, 4 Jun 2015 07:54:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd.contact@marino.st) Received: from [10.31.9.247] (unknown [213.225.137.129]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by shepard.synsport.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id F04A843BE7; Thu, 4 Jun 2015 02:54:54 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <5570044D.2080605@marino.st> Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2015 09:54:53 +0200 From: John Marino Reply-To: marino@freebsd.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bryan Drewery , Baptiste Daroussin , ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r388045 - head/mail/sendmail References: <201505302354.t4UNspIF017886@svn.freebsd.org> <556FE9D1.3090306@marino.st> <556FECB9.6050301@FreeBSD.org> <556FEEA2.2070001@marino.st> <556FF15E.2050500@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <556FF15E.2050500@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2015 07:54:58 -0000 On 6/4/2015 08:34, Bryan Drewery wrote: > On 6/4/2015 1:22 AM, John Marino wrote: >> In this *particular* case, I spent a LOT of time fixing THIS port so it >> built properly on both platforms. Particularly in cases like that, it's >> polite to put the port back how it was found. This was not an easy port >> to fix and thankfully dinoex accepted those changes. > > We don't care. Please do not report DRAGONFLY problems on this list. > Harassing FreeBSD committers about DragonFly is my major objection to > the entire effort. We should not be expected to test our changes on > DragonFly or to set it up to fix any fallout there. I will be raising this issue formally with portmgr. I have already gotten feedback that the rest of the portmanagers are not aligned with your way of thinking and that you do not speak for them. They recognize the major benefits that DragonFly participation has already brought, plus my personal contributions which far exceed yours over the last 18 months. Please remove me from the poudriere project as well. You've projected your personal bias on that as well (e.g. don't care about typical console use) and it's clear that you are a difficult person to work with. At the very least, it is clear that you and I can't work together -- and I have tried, believe me. I have some more good ideas for poudriere features, but at this point I'll just add them to a fork. John