From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 6 16:38:17 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78FEB16A468 for ; Fri, 6 Jul 2007 16:38:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from julian@elischer.org) Received: from outK.internet-mail-service.net (outK.internet-mail-service.net [216.240.47.234]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FE0B13C46A for ; Fri, 6 Jul 2007 16:38:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from julian@elischer.org) Received: from mx0.idiom.com (HELO idiom.com) (216.240.32.160) by out.internet-mail-service.net (qpsmtpd/0.32) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 Jul 2007 09:38:17 -0700 Received: from julian-mac.elischer.org (home.elischer.org [216.240.48.38]) by idiom.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4384F125AE4; Fri, 6 Jul 2007 09:38:16 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <468E7007.5050607@elischer.org> Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2007 09:38:31 -0700 From: Julian Elischer User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.4 (Macintosh/20070604) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ed Schouten References: <20070705122650.GE1302@britannica.bec.de> <468E16E6.6030608@delphij.net> <20070706112453.GA3217@hoeg.nl> In-Reply-To: <20070706112453.GA3217@hoeg.nl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Hackers , Robert Watson , d@delphij.net Subject: Re: add closefrom() call X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2007 16:38:17 -0000 Ed Schouten wrote: > * LI Xin wrote: >> Here is my implementation for FreeBSD. Some difference between my and >> DragonFly's implementation: >> >> - closefrom(-1) would be no-op on DragonFly, my version would close all >> open files (From my understanding of OpenSolaris's userland >> implementation, this is Solaris's behavior). >> - my version closefrom(very_big_fd) would result in EBADF. I am not >> very sure whether this is correct, but it does not hurt for applications >> that thinks closefrom() would return void. > > Wouldn't it be better to just implement it through fcntl() and implement > closefrom() in libc? > that's a possibility but I personally thing the huge difference in efficiency makes it worth putting it in the kernel. Quite a few programs I know of could really help their startup time with this as the first thing they do is "close the first 2000 file descriptors.