From owner-freebsd-advocacy  Wed Jul 28 23:14:51 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org
Received: from zippy.cdrom.com (zippy.cdrom.com [204.216.27.228])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA5AE14E52
	for <advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG>; Wed, 28 Jul 1999 23:14:49 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from jkh@zippy.cdrom.com)
Received: from zippy.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by zippy.cdrom.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA01290;
	Wed, 28 Jul 1999 23:14:38 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from jkh@zippy.cdrom.com)
To: Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai <asmodai@wxs.nl>
Cc: advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Selfstyled arrogance? 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 26 Jul 1999 13:10:18 +0200."
             <77276D633FA.AAA9A@po03.wxs.nl> 
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 1999 23:14:38 -0700
Message-ID: <1286.933228878@zippy.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@zippy.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

> read this form of selfstyled arrogance:

It's not arrogance.  As far as they're concerned (and remember that
this is SCO talking), the Linux ABI is "good enough" as a standard ABI
for the x86 and they're probably right.  If you were so motivated to
have a different common format, why didn't you join the x86open
consortium and contribute something to the effort? :)

- Jordan


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message