From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Feb 21 13:29:00 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) id NAA16079 for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 21 Feb 1995 13:29:00 -0800 Received: from UUCP-GW.CC.UH.EDU (root@UUCP-GW.CC.UH.EDU [129.7.1.11]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) with SMTP id NAA16070; Tue, 21 Feb 1995 13:28:47 -0800 Received: from Taronga.COM by UUCP-GW.CC.UH.EDU with UUCP id AA03491 (5.67a/IDA-1.5); Tue, 21 Feb 1995 15:15:30 -0600 Received: by bonkers.taronga.com (smail2.5p) id AA22268; 21 Feb 95 12:50:06 CST (Tue) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bonkers.taronga.com (8.6.8/8.6.6) with SMTP id MAA22265; Tue, 21 Feb 1995 12:50:05 -0600 Message-Id: <199502211850.MAA22265@bonkers.taronga.com> X-Authentication-Warning: bonkers.taronga.com: Host localhost didn't use HELO protocol To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Cc: Mark Hittinger , hackers@freefall.cdrom.com Subject: Re: A "FreeBSD" Daemon In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 21 Feb 95 09:35:20 PST." <16903.793388120@freefall.cdrom.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 1.4.1 7/21/94 Date: Tue, 21 Feb 1995 12:50:03 -0600 From: Peter da Silva Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > If anything, we need to change our daemon significantly enough that > we're not perceived as mini-BSDIs (though I suppose we could be > perceived as worse things!). I think mini-BSDI is exactly the thing you want to be perceived as. All the quality and twice as friendly... > Perhaps we could take the opportunity to > make him even less threatening to the bible-belters at the same time, > maybe putting little corks on the ends of his trident (get the child > safety vote), pants on the daemon (moral majority), shrink his horns > down and give him a bushy squirrel-like tail (animal rights and > cute-and-furry vote). Cool! Can we do the Jordan Hubbard As Crazed Toon Ferret Hacker Stoked On Jolt And Chinese Food logo as well?