From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 11 11:20:20 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8066637B4C1 for ; Fri, 11 Jul 2003 11:20:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E244943F93 for ; Fri, 11 Jul 2003 11:20:13 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h6BIKDUp056597 for ; Fri, 11 Jul 2003 11:20:13 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h6BIKDv0056596; Fri, 11 Jul 2003 11:20:13 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2003 11:20:13 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200307111820.h6BIKDv0056596@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Ceri Davies Subject: Re: ports/54293: [patch][non-maintainer] add identification to postgresql72 configuration dialog X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Ceri Davies List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2003 18:20:21 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/54293; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Ceri Davies To: FreeBSD Gnats Submit Cc: Subject: Re: ports/54293: [patch][non-maintainer] add identification to postgresql72 configuration dialog Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2003 19:14:54 +0100 Adding to audit trail, from misfiled PR ports/54307: Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2003 09:14:22 +0200 From: Palle Girgensohn Message-Id: <17670000.1057821262@palle.girgensohn.se> References: <200307092351.h69Np5Il096982@lonesome.lonesome.com> Hi, I guess there's no harm in adding these labels, it is a good idea, though I advice you to consider using postgresql7 instead. The only reason to get the older postgresql72 installed via portupgrade is to set WITH_POSTGRES72=YES and building something that depends on libgda2. If you manually decide to use postgresl72, perhaps one can expect that the user has used that port before and that he/she would recognize it? Perhaps not. The patch is OK with me - as I said, its a good idea. :) /Palle / maintainer