From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Jun  5 20:14:04 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: arch@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A8441065670;
	Tue,  5 Jun 2012 20:14:04 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from asmrookie@gmail.com)
Received: from mail-lpp01m010-f54.google.com (mail-lpp01m010-f54.google.com
	[209.85.215.54])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78BF98FC08;
	Tue,  5 Jun 2012 20:14:03 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by laai10 with SMTP id i10so5214325laa.13
	for <multiple recipients>; Tue, 05 Jun 2012 13:14:02 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
	:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=48RbuAC1Bs4gm51Wx/oRorkom0LY4BcDYWBFZcd52IQ=;
	b=aDb/RaZPLos5Y9ZBL3uMc2ba/7As8Jz/Zh7iW2Rujg9Fl4cOYHSYl9o0C7/UBMQsQk
	7aTqm3JdRwQ20AbukwszX3Slw8Q2Vd3+uplN3QMAfKLAi1Sb4R8h5JXrIPlEYWHKYXq7
	eGsXlXj7X+P739Qhnh6wyhizLsVLy5eqIvtpP4BAKvth/hKqHBT2el4999+/suC54Obe
	ZhwV9RPh+bMYJv1nPepm7aw1uPegjLM7znMjZiO4aHZQs7iZM0JEHZ+syFzo4slPf3LJ
	fQXAx88Ys/apdYL77kmGFruki17nB53yXINbST9QHUYguz5TyJZ5hJiAIg8A9iIbA8gc
	ky+w==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.112.45.4 with SMTP id i4mr8723394lbm.79.1338927242177; Tue, 05
	Jun 2012 13:14:02 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: asmrookie@gmail.com
Received: by 10.112.27.65 with HTTP; Tue, 5 Jun 2012 13:14:02 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAJ-Vmo=F-=1UYcW0xBiNbjHa8CN7S=iDJ_bQDn4ESS3CumJf_A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <86bokyvtc2.fsf@ds4.des.no>
	<CAJ-FndAMsoB1RAyS-Pa1JCv7W0qsviRxtShZ3uk_Tpd+J_EBaQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAJ-FndAadYbqiWUTupXLEcRMkYYL50Ssehi8f8vv6YXvQzy4OA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAJ-Vmo=F-=1UYcW0xBiNbjHa8CN7S=iDJ_bQDn4ESS3CumJf_A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2012 21:14:02 +0100
X-Google-Sender-Auth: Hk2hMq-jYJ-9tNhvIusoz3k2wtM
Message-ID: <CAJ-FndAjcfd21xwYHPrSxgz32eHp2xTGRao1Kyqx4yBZTPD94A@mail.gmail.com>
From: Attilio Rao <attilio@freebsd.org>
To: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: =?UTF-8?Q?Dag=2DErling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no>, arch@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: KTR_SPAREx
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture <freebsd-arch.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2012 20:14:04 -0000

2012/6/5 Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org>:
> Hi,
>
> I'm very tempted to make if_ath use KTR_DEV, but then have an extra
> ath sysctl which does something like:
>
> if (sc->sc_ktr_enable)
> =C2=A0 =C2=A0KTR();

But the actual problem is that your output will be overwhelmed by the
clutter of all the other KTR_DEV consumers.

We very much need an much higher granularity on KTR classes and
possibly a way to use it on-the-fly for kernel development and I think
what I suggested earlier makes sense.

Attilio


--=20
Peace can only be achieved by understanding - A. Einstein