From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 21 20:23:48 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::35]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A497410656D6; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 20:23:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (hub.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::36]) by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 337A215642C; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 20:23:48 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4E00FDD7.3060204@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 13:23:51 -0700 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110616 Thunderbird/3.1.11 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: jhell References: <4E00F5A9.6040900@FreeBSD.org> <20110621200214.GB62312@DataIX.net> In-Reply-To: <20110621200214.GB62312@DataIX.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: sunpoet@freebsd.org, FreeBSD Ports Subject: Re: shells/ksh93 install fail X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 20:23:48 -0000 On 6/21/2011 1:02 PM, jhell wrote: > > > On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 12:48:57PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: >> An effort to upgrade to 20110208_1 is failing for me: >> >> ===> Installing for ksh93-20110208_1 >> ===> Generating temporary packing list >> ===> Checking if shells/ksh93 already installed >> install -o root -g wheel -m 555 >> /usr/local/tmp/usr/ports/shells/ksh93/work/bin/ksh /usr/local/bin/ksh93 >> install: $WRKDIRPREFIX/usr/ports/shells/ksh93/work/bin/ksh: No such file >> or directory >> *** Error code 71 >> >> Is it possible that $WRKDIRPREFIX is the trigger? >> > > I did not actually see that here on 8-STABLE/i386, just for the record. Thanks. At least one person on IRC said that it worked for them with or without $WRKDIRPREFIX, so that's probably not it. What's odd is that these package building systems have been working fine for hundreds of ports for quite a while now, so I'm stumped. -- Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much. -- OK Go Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS. Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/