From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 4 01:48:00 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6A7316A4CE for ; Sat, 4 Sep 2004 01:48:00 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sccmmhc92.asp.att.net (sccmmhc92.asp.att.net [204.127.203.212]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 594D843D45 for ; Sat, 4 Sep 2004 01:48:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from m.hauber@mchsi.com) Received: from [10.51.10.3] (12-219-204-133.client.mchsi.com[12.219.204.133]) by sccmmhc92.asp.att.net (sccmmhc92) with ESMTP id <20040904014759m920002rg4e>; Sat, 4 Sep 2004 01:47:59 +0000 From: Mike Hauber To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2004 21:49:14 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.7 X-Copyright: 2004, Michael C. Hauber. All rights reserved. X-Notice: Duplication, modification, and/or redistribution are prohibited without proper consent from the author. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200409032149.14573.m.hauber@mchsi.com> Subject: portupgrade, portsdb -U failing, ruby dumping core X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: m.hauber@mchsi.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Sep 2004 01:48:01 -0000 I've seen this twice on my system (4.1.0). The first time it happened, I fetched a new index, ran cvsup, updated the portsdb, and everything seemed to work okay for about three weeks. The second time was a couple of days ago. I rebuilt a cvsup'd system, removed the entire ports tree, reinstalled it, ran cvsup, and portsdb updated without incident. So far, no problems, and I've been poking at it regularly just to see if it will do it again soon so I can try to capture it. At first, I figured it had something to do with blanktime (or apm), but I didn't have them installed the second time it happened... Still waiting to see if I can catch it in the act. That said, I don't think it has anything to do with the version of the system's build. More later (hopefully not, but... :) ) Mike