From owner-svn-ports-head@freebsd.org  Fri Apr 29 07:47:24 2016
Return-Path: <owner-svn-ports-head@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE665B200E5;
 Fri, 29 Apr 2016 07:47:24 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B42F916E6;
 Fri, 29 Apr 2016 07:47:24 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org)
Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033)
 id B217F116B; Fri, 29 Apr 2016 07:47:24 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2016 07:47:24 +0000
From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org>
To: Christoph Moench-Tegeder <cmt@burggraben.net>
Cc: Christoph Moench-Tegeder <cmt@FreeBSD.org>,
 ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org,
 svn-ports-head@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: svn commit: r414106 - head/graphics/shotwell
Message-ID: <20160429074724.GA63859@FreeBSD.org>
References: <201604271242.u3RCg7IB031266@repo.freebsd.org>
 <20160429071040.GA56016@FreeBSD.org>
 <20160429074042.GA1547@elch.exwg.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20160429074042.GA1547@elch.exwg.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.0 (2016-04-01)
X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21
Precedence: list
List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head
 <svn-ports-head.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/svn-ports-head>, 
 <mailto:svn-ports-head-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-ports-head/>
List-Post: <mailto:svn-ports-head@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:svn-ports-head-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-ports-head>,
 <mailto:svn-ports-head-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2016 07:47:24 -0000

On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 09:40:42AM +0200, Christoph Moench-Tegeder wrote:
> So - should I fix that at the next update or only when I have to touch
> that line anyway?

I would leave it as is now, it does not warrant another commit just for
its sake.  Next time USES gains or loses an entry, you should take this
opportunity to sort and properly wrap it.

./danfe