Date: Sun, 10 Oct 1999 20:26:27 -0600 From: Brett Glass <brett@lariat.org> To: Brooks Davis <brooks@one-eyed-alien.net>, James Wyatt <jwyatt@rwsystems.net> Cc: Brooks Davis <brooks@one-eyed-alien.net>, "Nicole H." <nicole@unixgirl.com>, freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: scanning of port 12345 Message-ID: <4.2.0.58.19991010202528.042c0b70@localhost> In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.10.9910101804350.16508-100000@orion.ac.hmc.edu> References: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9910101900340.71027-100000@bsdie.rwsystems.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 06:10 PM 10/10/99 -0700, Brooks Davis wrote: >Neither Netbus or BackOriface provide any machanisms for attacking a >machine. Not so. A remote sniffer is a great way to get passwords. > Netbus is sold just like any other remote monitoring and admin >tool including several that cost thousands of dollars. CDC (the authors >of BO) have a webpage pointing out that there is almost no difference >between their product that the Microsoft System Management Server. And you believe them? --Brett To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4.2.0.58.19991010202528.042c0b70>