From owner-freebsd-hardware Tue Dec 10 9:59:37 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A1AC37B401 for ; Tue, 10 Dec 2002 09:59:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from yama.geminisolutions.com (yama.geminisolutions.com [216.57.214.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3820443EA9 for ; Tue, 10 Dec 2002 09:59:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from michael@staff.openaccess.org) Received: from [192.168.4.254] (internal.openaccess.org [216.57.214.120]) by yama.geminisolutions.com (8.12.3/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gBAHlLK9036775; Tue, 10 Dec 2002 09:47:21 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from michael@staff.openaccess.org) User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/10.0.0.1309 Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 09:59:16 -0800 Subject: Re: Promise RAID controller From: Michael DeMan To: Alexander Langer Cc: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20021209223115.GT45467@fump.kawo2.rwth-aachen.de> Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hi, We're running 4.6.2. We had no remote access. The failure was on the swap partition and it would not respond to TCP connections. The physical console was still fine. The worst of this is we tested hot swapping drives, rebuilding arrays in the background, everything and were thinking we were in good shape. We have a half-dozen of these boxes with identical hardware configuration in production now and cannot afford to have them lock up if a drive fails. I agree about IDE-RAID, but we are on a tight budget and need only reliability, not performance, from these machines. - Mike On 12/9/02 2:31 PM, "Alexander Langer" wrote: > Thus spake Michael DeMan (michael@staff.openaccess.org): > >> We are using Promise RAID controllers built on motherboards. These provide >> simple RAID-1 mirroring for us. > > Same here. > >> My assumption would be that the RAID controller would respond and >> automatically detach a bad disk. > > That's actually what it should do, and once already did here -- on a > 4.6-STABLE box - older kernel's showed a similar behaviour. I remotely > had the impression the box hung, but maybe it had the same symptoms as > your box. What version are you using? > > Anyways, I wouldn't actually recommend User-Hardware such as the > ATA-RAID-Controllers for production systems anyways. > > Alex > Michael F. DeMan Director of Technology OpenAccess Internet Services 1305 11th St., 3rd Floor Bellingham, WA 98225 Tel 360-647-0785 x204 Fax 360-738-9785 michael@staff.openaccess.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hardware" in the body of the message