From owner-freebsd-security Thu May 18 10: 3: 4 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from srh0902.urh.uiuc.edu (srh0902.urh.uiuc.edu [130.126.76.224]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 57E3E37BC87 for ; Thu, 18 May 2000 10:02:43 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ftobin@uiuc.edu) Received: (qmail 8630 invoked by uid 1000); 18 May 2000 17:02:39 -0000 Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 18 May 2000 17:02:39 -0000 Date: Thu, 18 May 2000 12:02:39 -0500 (CDT) From: Frank Tobin X-Sender: ftobin@srh0902.urh.uiuc.edu To: security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: HEADS UP: New host key for freefall! In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Robert Watson, at 11:31 -0400 on Thu, 18 May 2000, wrote: > However, I think an organized campaign here would make a difference--if > your company has an NAI/PGP sales rep, let them know that you're > interested in a native FreeBSD build. In particular, let them know if you > are willing to spend money--there's no point in building a visible demand > that falls through on the sales side, making it less likely to happen next > time :-). Currently, GnuPG is probably a more acceptable open source OpenPGP implementation than NAI's PGP. The fact that it is totally unencumbered by patents and developed outside the US is good for any import-export quirks. -- Frank Tobin http://www.uiuc.edu/~ftobin/ "To learn what is good and what is to be valued, those truths which cannot be shaken or changed." Myst: The Book of Atrus To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message