From owner-p4-projects@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Feb 20 20:46:26 2006
Return-Path: <owner-p4-projects@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: p4-projects@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: p4-projects@freebsd.org
Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 32767)
	id 67B5C16A423; Mon, 20 Feb 2006 20:46:26 +0000 (GMT)
X-Original-To: perforce@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: perforce@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1D5416A420;
	Mon, 20 Feb 2006 20:46:22 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from dingo@microbsd.net)
Received: from mail.optimhosts.com (bastille.optimhosts.com [203.177.161.185])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECC9D43D45;
	Mon, 20 Feb 2006 20:46:21 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from dingo@microbsd.net)
Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1])
	by mail.optimhosts.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CEED8C86B3;
	Tue, 21 Feb 2006 04:48:03 +0800 (PHT)
Received: from mail.optimhosts.com ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (bastille.optimhosts.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new,
	port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 79576-07; Tue, 21 Feb 2006 04:47:35 +0800 (PHT)
Received: from [192.168.2.185] (adsl-217-74-108.asm.bellsouth.net
	[68.217.74.108])
	by mail.optimhosts.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4304B8C8541;
	Tue, 21 Feb 2006 04:47:31 +0800 (PHT)
From: D1ng0 <dingo@microbsd.net>
To: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <200602201359.35492.jhb@freebsd.org>
References: <200602191929.k1JJTN06063193@repoman.freebsd.org>
	<200602201359.35492.jhb@freebsd.org>
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2006 04:45:38 +0800
Message-Id: <1140468339.799.9.camel@pavilion.optimlabs.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.2.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at bastille.optimhosts.com
Cc: rwatson@freebsd.org, Scott Kamp <scottk@freebsd.org>,
	Perforce Change Reviews <perforce@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: PERFORCE change 92056 for review
X-BeenThere: p4-projects@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: p4 projects tree changes <p4-projects.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/p4-projects>,
	<mailto:p4-projects-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/p4-projects>
List-Post: <mailto:p4-projects@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:p4-projects-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/p4-projects>,
	<mailto:p4-projects-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2006 20:46:27 -0000


> FYI, all the other TrustedBSD branches use 'trustedbsd_' as a prefix of their 
> branch name:
> 
> trustedbsd_acl
> trustedbsd_acl_nfsv4
> trustedbsd_audit
> trustedbsd_audit2
> trustedbsd_audit3
> trustedbsd_audit3_old
> trustedbsd_audit3_openbsm_sys
> trustedbsd_cap
> trustedbsd_doc
> trustedbsd_dsep
> trustedbsd_mac
> trustedbsd_objlabel
> trustedbsd_openbsm_audit3
> trustedbsd_sebsd
> trustedbsd_sedarwin
> 
> If you were following that pattern you would use 'trustedbsd_sebsd2' rather 
> than just 'sebsd2'.  Also, all the other TrustedBSD branches are branched 
> from the 'trustedbsd' base branch in //depot/projects/trustedbsd/base/...  
> For example, the audit3 branch's view is:
> 
> View:
>         //depot/projects/trustedbsd/base/... //depot/projects/trustedbsd/audit3/...
> 
> Wherease the sebsd2 branch's view is:
> 
> View:
>         //depot/vendor/freebsd/src/... //depot/projects/trustedbsd/sebsd2/...
> 
> Is the inconsistency intentional?
> 

the trustedbsd_ branch name was an over sight, the branching
from //depot/vendor/freebsd/src/... instead
of //depot/projects/trustedbsd/base/...  was due to a conversation
pertaining to pulling in audit to sebsd2 while working to bring it
current, referring to the specific email would be 

                           Subject: 
Re: Migrating SeBSD to CUREENT - Are
we alive ???
                              Date: 
Thu, 16 Feb 2006 13:45:11 +0000
(GMT)  (21:45 PHT)

where Robert stated it would be best to branch from vendor/freebsd or
even trustedbsd/mac to include the audit code, though mac is in an
untested state.  So i went with vendor/src/... now as for the branch
name, how can we resolv that.